Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 3

• 100%

  Radiofreeeuropa3 months, 1 week ago

  This bodes poorly for neocon "bomb bomb bombers".
  The media is occupied. Any doubt?
  Look at the ties of media owners to military contracts.

  Reply
• 0%

  ekklesiawarrior3 months, 1 week ago

  We are in the midst of a Global Economic Meltdown.
  There are better things to dispose of at he moment.
  
  The media keeps missing the key contents, sure but only look whom owns what. Thsi does NOT EXCLUDE PRPELLER.

  Reply
• 0%

  Thinker223 months, 1 week ago

  From the article:
  
  "Since most Palestinians are willing to accept a two-state solution, the Iranian president is, in effect, agreeing to Israel's right to exist and opening the door to a peace deal that Iran will endorse."
  
  Well, THIS is what most Palestinians are willing to accept. It's clearly stated in the Palestinian National Charter (Constitution):
  
  Article 19:
  The partition of Palestine in 1947 and the establishment of the state of Israel are entirely illegal, regardless of the passage of time, because they were contrary to the will of the Palestinian people and to their natural right in their homeland, and inconsistent with the principles embodied in the Charter of the United Nations; particularly the right to self-determination.
  
  Article 21:
  The Arab Palestinian people, expressing themselves by the armed Palestinian revolution, reject all solutions which are substitutes for the total liberation of Palestine and reject all proposals aiming at the liquidation of the Palestinian problem, or its internationalization.
  
  Someone should remind the authors of the article that false assumptions inevitably lead to false conclusions. In this case, the assumption that "most Palestinians are willing to accept a two-state solution" was obviously false.
  
  The headlines will be in place when the Palestinian will agree to the right of Israel to exist and will declare their willingness to stop violence and start peace negotiations.

  Reply