Propeller Week In Review: July 18, 2008 »
Posted by: JamesMarcus 1 month ago199 Comments Report this Story
Petroleum was very much on the mind of the Propeller community this week. But so was Karl Rove, gay rights, and a certain, extremely charming jackass.
Read Full Story at newsquake.netscape.com
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 199
-
-

RedWhine1 month ago
-
-

Blackacereturn1 month ago
-
TLovesTeddyComment removed: User banned.8 Replies
-
-
-
-

texangelwings1 month ago
Good review! Thanks James Marcus! It did get a little heated with some of the article discussiongs.
Reply-

BronxBomber1 month ago
It wouldn't be Propeller w/o the usual commentary "donneybrooks" in the threads...
Reply -
TLovesTeddyComment removed: User banned.9 Replies
-
-

SonOfTheMask1 month ago
"Replied Goppy (in a strikingly lucid moment)..."
HA! Sorry, James, couldn't resist quoting that one...
Reply-

JamesMarcus1 month ago
-

ranchhand1 month ago
Now hold on there. There are a whole lot of people on here that are smarter than goopy. Acting the Christian comic relief, really making fun of Christians. I would vote for people like Stephen Johnson, Formidable, Sonofmask, Alpha, h saleem, Cactus annie, smithitchi,catstevens, dicax maximus, tangling, red river, pc25, Timaloftis... klarissa, nixie,Ani,stoners
,spadecaller,aceofspades, James Marcus.
And even ,gag, jovial,and neophile, gag,.
And many others before I chose goppy.
Reply
-
-
catstevensComment removed: User banned.11 Replies
-

ind061 month ago
-

JamesMarcus1 month ago
-

HannibalBarca1 month ago
-
-

1-2-Oscar1 month ago
-
-

ranchhand1 month ago
-

CactusAnnie1 month ago
-
-

gadgetstoday1 month ago
-
-

questionseverything1 month ago
" MajJohn disagreed: "In the due course of carrying out his duties in office, the President is entitled to have his communications kept private, or his office would become subordinate to Congress.
i guess i am the only one that thinks these reviews r bs...the neo con talking points r given credence and reforced by the author week after week
i pasted majjohns bs as an example..whr in the constitution does it say that john? NO WHR just like exectutive priveledge doesnt exist in the constitution...it is a gift from the supreme court and even they have put limits on it,military or foriegn policy "secrets" only....so which part of rove ignoring a congressional supeona is covered when the questioning is about the us justice department being used for political purposes?
Reply-
TLovesTeddyComment removed: User banned.
-
-
TLovesTeddyComment removed: User banned.1 Reply
-
TLovesTeddyComment removed: User banned.3 Replies

