Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback

Propeller Week In Review: July 18, 2008 »

Posted by: JamesMarcus 1 month ago

199 Comments Report this Story

9.9

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 229

Propped: 204

Comments: 199

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

Petroleum was very much on the mind of the Propeller community this week. But so was Karl Rove, gay rights, and a certain, extremely charming jackass.

Read Full Story at newsquake.netscape.com

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 199
  • 0%
    TimALoftis1 month ago

    lol...love the pic of your donkey, ranchhand.

    Reply

    48 Replies

    • 0%
      RedWhine1 month ago

      I thought that was a picture of good old Tessy (AKA Tlovesteddy).

      Reply

      32 Replies

    • 0%
      RedWhine1 month ago

      My bad Mr. Bomber. Ranchhands' donkey is better looking.

      Reply

      13 Replies

    • 0%
      ranchhand1 month ago

      thank you Tim

      Reply
    • 0%
      texangelwings1 month ago

      Good review! Thanks James Marcus! It did get a little heated with some of the article discussiongs.

      Reply

      11 Replies

    • 0%
      SonOfTheMask1 month ago

      "Replied Goppy (in a strikingly lucid moment)..."

      HA! Sorry, James, couldn't resist quoting that one...

      Reply

      15 Replies

      • 0%
        JamesMarcus1 month ago

        Well, I think Goppy is always lucid. But there are also degrees of lucidity....

        Reply

        14 Replies

    • 0%
      BronxBomber1 month ago

      Is that an albino donkey? Cool!

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 0%
        ranchhand1 month ago

        BB That is a rare White ass. not an albino.

        Reply
      • 0%
        ind061 month ago

        Between last week and this week's WIR we all just seem like like such a dour and angry bunch... Sigh... Well it's not from my lack of trying, and the donkey was cute. :)

        And Goppy said "ding dang" on two separate occasions... That was cool.

        Reply

        8 Replies

      • 0%
        1-2-Oscar1 month ago

        Be careful now, James. If you ever write a bad WIR, ranchhand can send you a picture of the xxx (other end) of his xxx (domesticated animal).

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 0%
          JamesMarcus1 month ago

          That prospect will certainly keep my on my best behavior.

          Reply
        • 0%
          Pupi1 month ago

          Great wrap-up as always, James.

          Lovely animal you have there, Ranchhand!

          Reply
          • 0%
            ranchhand1 month ago

            I am really flattered that you all are admiring my little white ass. It sure makes me proud to know that its news worthy.

            Reply

            4 Replies

            • 0%
              CactusAnnie1 month ago

              Now that it's famous, have you picked out a name for it yet? Gonna tell us?

              Your cute little white ass is being seen 'round the world.

              Reply

              3 Replies

          • 0%
            gadgetstoday1 month ago

            I thought that was a picture of good old Tessy (AKA Tlovesteddy).

            Reply

            2 Replies

          • 0%
            STONERS1 month ago

            Another great WIR, thanks James...

            Reply
            • 0%
              questionseverything1 month ago

              " MajJohn disagreed: "In the due course of carrying out his duties in office, the President is entitled to have his communications kept private, or his office would become subordinate to Congress.

              i guess i am the only one that thinks these reviews r bs...the neo con talking points r given credence and reforced by the author week after week

              i pasted majjohns bs as an example..whr in the constitution does it say that john? NO WHR just like exectutive priveledge doesnt exist in the constitution...it is a gift from the supreme court and even they have put limits on it,military or foriegn policy "secrets" only....so which part of rove ignoring a congressional supeona is covered when the questioning is about the us justice department being used for political purposes?

              Reply

              1 Reply