Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback

'First Guantanamo video' released »

Posted by: 899webdesign 1 month, 1 week ago

9.7

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 127

Propped: 111

Comments: 275

Click Prop It to Raise Score

Prop it

A videotape of a detainee being questioned at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp has been released for the first time, Canadian media have reported.

Read Full Story at news.bbc.co.uk

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment

Comments So Far: 275

0%
hsaleem1 month, 1 week ago

Wow that's what we call a perfect example of justice, tolerance, love and peace.
Reply
21 Replies
- 0%
  MajJohn1 month, 1 week ago
  
  Very true on the part of the interrogator.
  Reply
  2 Replies
  - 0%
    Candida1 month, 1 week ago
    
    These were Canadian interrogators. The US interrogation took place in the months before this and that tape hasn't been released.
    Reply
  - 0%
    Blackacereturn1 month ago
    
    Sad!
    Reply
- 0%
  protoham1 month, 1 week ago
  
  The should have shot on site for throwing a grenade at out troops.
  Reply
  11 Replies
  - 0%
    eddie1071 month, 1 week ago
    
    Yes, but if a Muslim is shot to stop them from shooting at you, that is murder.
    If an American is shot, well, according to the liberals, he deserved it because we all know how evil and vicious Americans are.
    ...Or is it because we are spreading knowledge and information around the world?
    Reply
    10 Replies
    - 0%
      chuck-the-canuck1 month, 1 week ago
      
      You're spreading something alright, but it isn't knowledge or information.
      Reply
      9 Replies
      - 0%
        eddie1071 month, 1 week ago
        
        Now there is a well thought out informative contribution to a conversation. Well researched documented evidence that you have obviously worked tirelessly to uncover in order to show what a cerebral giant you truly are. You certainly are working hard to battle the forces of evil.
        Tell me something Chucky, how do you suppose to stop the Muslims that are murdering women and children of their own religion? You know, the ones who actually faced the greatest fear of their lives and raised their hands to say I would like to have a life too! Only to be murdered by some psycho religious terrorist who cannot stand for anyone to not live in fear?
        Why do you suppose it is that 90% of young Muslims are turning against Islam? Could it be information? Surely not, but you obviously know, please wont you tell us? And please don't use your @$$ to write with again.
        Reply
        8 Replies
        
        0%
        chuck-the-canuck1 month, 1 week ago
        
        "how do you suppose to stop the Muslims that are murdering women and children of their own religion?"
        I don't. What makes you think that it is any of your business?
        Remember the Inquisition? Your brothers in christ had no problem killing a few of their own.
        When the middle east is ready to make changes, it will make the changes. The US is there only to protect its own interests. If you think it is there for any other reason, except maybe to protect Israel, you are a fool.
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        0%
        eddie1071 month ago
        
        No they are there because I WANT THEM THERE.
        I want the monsters who attacked America and killed more people than were killed in Pearl Harbor, to be stopped. No MORE. It wasn't a country that attacked us, but Muslim extremists. And if they are he77 bent on attacking us, we will most certainly show them what they can expect if they ever get such a brilliant idea again.
        The 911 attacks have not bolstered the power of the muslim dynasty, and if anything, it has gained the attention of the world to the horrific tactics used by these troglodytes, not only to people of other religions, but on the women and children of their own religion.
        Reply
        
        0%
        eddie1071 month ago
        
        BTW - 911 makes it everyone in America's business.
        Reply
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        If they have to kill a few million women, kids and Jews to get there, that's fine, right?
        Reply
        
        0%
        Candida1 month, 1 week ago
        
        eddie107: "how do you suppose to stop the Muslims that are murdering women and children of their own religion?"
        Are you planning to stop every single group that is murdering its own? I'm afraid you will be very busy for a while.
        .
        "Why do you suppose it is that 90% of young Muslims are turning against Islam?"
        First, where did you get that statistic? Second, if that's the case, then I'm sure they can take care of the remaining 10%, it's just a matter of time, and the West better stay out of their business. We should stick to the "information" part since it seems to be more effective than anything anyone has tried so far.
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        0%
        eddie1071 month ago
        
        The information part is why the troglodytes are furious with the west, and that is why they are he77 bent on murdering anyone from America.
        And by your position on life, we never should have gonne to Europe to fight those poor little nazis either should should we. You are JUST LIKE the same libs from pre WWII that cried foul when we fought Germany.
        The good part about information and knowledge, is that once it is obtained, you cannot take it back. The younger generations of Middle Eastern people are learning about the rest of the world, and will some day join us in a world where everyone can live in peace.
        That is why my Nephew is there today helping to build a better world for the children of tommorrow.
        Reply
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        You're assuming that we accept that statistic. I don't buy it.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        Candida1 month ago
        
        Neither do I.
        Reply
- 0%
  DropkickaLib1 month, 1 week ago
  
  So did he actually kill the soldier or does that matter to the Libs? He was actively participating as an armed combatant in the battle but that's no proof, right? Some officer should have given him the coup de grace on the battlefield and finished off the rest of the Taliban wounded.
  Reply
  5 Replies
  - 0%
    Candida1 month, 1 week ago
    
    DropkickaLib: "So did he actually kill the soldier or does that matter to the Libs?"
    I guess that's what his trial is supposed to determine, doesn't it? Except he's been waiting for it for almost seven years by now.
    Also, he was practically a child, and don't forget that he was fighting an invading army. The Taliban was the government in Afghanistan and they were protecting their homeland.
    What would you do if another country invaded the US? Greet them with flowers?
    Reply
    4 Replies
    - 0%
      eddie1071 month, 1 week ago
      
      The Canadian Government doesn't see it that way. Practically a child???? Does age make any difference when it comes to Murdering another Human Being?
      And you mean if another group of people attacked America like by flying innocent people into highly populated buildings in order to murder them all, You are absolutely right. They most certainly deserve our undivided attention, no matter what country they live in, we should track them down and cleanse the earth of the pigs that would do such a thing.
      Reply
      2 Replies
      - 0%
        Candida1 month, 1 week ago
        
        eddie107: "Does age make any difference when it comes to Murdering another Human Being?"
        Yes, it does. Occasionally juveniles are tried as adults, but that's the exception.
        .
        "we should track them down and cleanse the earth of the pigs that would do such a thing."
        Then why don't you. The Afghans didn't attack the US, a bunch of Saudis did. Osama bin Laden is still at large and President Bush claimed as far back as 2002 that he didn't think much about him; he was not very important.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        Actually, a bunch of terrorists with their base of operations in Afghanistan attacked us. Changes the situation, eh?
        Reply
    - 0%
      DropkickaLib1 month ago
      
      We invaded Canada? That's news to me. Actually, the surrogates of the Taliban did launch a strike against the U.S. so we were justified in attacking them. Even forgetting recent history. He was old enough to pull the pin on a grenade and that made him a combatant.
      Reply
0%
nikkibabe1 month, 1 week ago

In this country a murder or rape suspect under 16 is considered a "JUVENILE".
Reply
66 Replies
- 0%
  pc251 month, 1 week ago
  
  tell that to the family of the soldier that was killed in his grenade attack
  Reply
  32 Replies
  - 0%
    rightfromwrong1 month, 1 week ago
    
    nothing has been proved yet....he is minor and should have been treated as such
    Reply
    9 Replies
    - 0%
      pc251 month, 1 week ago
      
      what is he doing on a on a battlefield then........the reports are that he lost his eye as a result of the grenade attack
      Reply
      1 Reply
      - 0%
        DropkickaLib1 month, 1 week ago
        
        Don't you know? He's innocent until proven Republican!
        Reply
    - 0%
      eddie1071 month, 1 week ago
      
      How exactly is a Mudering Minor supposed to be treated? Ice Cream and Pony Rides?
      Reply
      6 Replies
      - 0%
        Candida1 month, 1 week ago
        
        Not murdering, fighting, and even that hasn't been proven. Are the US soldiers murderers too when they kill someone?
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        eddie1071 month, 1 week ago
        
        So what you are asking is, if a US Soldier walked into a town and just randomly killed anyone who was Muslim, and was captured, they should just let him go because he was just doing his job.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        Candida1 month, 1 week ago
        
        This purportedly was a fight. That usually means that both sides are shooting.
        Reply
      - 0%
        kobzikov1 month, 1 week ago
        
        How about AT LEAST as well as serial killers get treated in US or Nazis who were running the death camps were treated.
        All in all, he should be treated NO WORSE than Jesse Spielman, US soldier convicted of rape and murder was treated.
        The simple fact that Omar Khadr was held for six years before being charged with anything shows that he was treated worse than a convicted murderer and a rapist. And that's without taking into the account that he was subjected to torture in the process.
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        eddie1071 month ago
        
        I would agree whole heartedly, murderers, Nazi's, serial killers, all get treated extremely too well.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        kobzikov1 month ago
        
        Apparently reading comprehension is not your forte.
        I've said nothing about whether listed criminals were treated well or if they were treated poorly, so I have no idea who it is that you are agreeing with.
        I simply stated that the same Constitutional and International standards should be applied to Omar Khadr, as to the listed criminals. A point that seems lost on you.
        I don't expect you to figure out that the "well treatment" of criminals is a direct result of following the Constitutional law, which probably makes you the expert not just on Constitutional law, but on what justice is.
        Reply
  - 0%
    Dionys1 month, 1 week ago
    
    "The Canadian citizen is accused of throwing a grenade that killed a US soldier in Afghanistan in 2002. "
    "tell that to the family of the soldier that was killed in his grenade attack"
    I accuse you of raping a goat.
    Now you've not only done that but been to Scotland.
    Reply
    21 Replies
    - 0%
      DropkickaLib1 month, 1 week ago
      
      So you equate takking the life of a soldier with sexual intercourse with a goat...typical Libbot!
      Reply
      20 Replies
      - 0%
        Global_Warmer1 month, 1 week ago
        
        Dickweedonys and Nikkiscab are in a competition to see who has the lower IQ. It's a tough call.
        Reply
      - 0%
        Candida1 month, 1 week ago
        
        DropkickaLib,
        You've missed Dionys' point. He simply demonstrated that being accused is not the same as being guilty.
        Reply
        14 Replies
        
        0%
        disraeli1 month, 1 week ago
        
        Candida
        Analogous - too many syllables.
        Drops would stop reading after the first two, if only for a little giggle.
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        dislexia stops reading when he doesn't see anything calling for all Republicans to be tried as war criminals.
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        disraeli1 month ago
        
        Droppings,
        You know that's not so. I read your comments after all.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        dislexia,
        You still didn't get the point though.
        Reply
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        But being found on the battlefield pulling the pin on a grenade is a pretty clear indication of culpability, don't ya think?
        Reply
        9 Replies
        
        0%
        disraeli1 month ago
        
        Droppings,
        If you choose you can read the after action report of the an American Special forces soldier - the only eye witnesses immediately after the grenade was thrown.
        When he entered the compound there were two men alive, Khadr and one other. The other man was facing the soldier (ie. facing in the direction that the grenade was thrown). Khadr was sitting on the ground with his back to the American soldiers.
        So your statement "being found on the battlefield pulling the pin on a grenade" is quite different and quite a stretch from the contemporaneous report given by the only eye witness.
        But carry on, don't let the best available evidence disturb your notions.
        Put Khadr on trial, in a proper court, with proper rules of evidence and competent independent counsel. That makes sense - the issues in this case, both factual and legal, are a far cry from the absolute black and white situation you speak of.
        
        Reply
        8 Replies
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        dislexia,
        Let's see. He was in an enemy encampment, right? He was already wounded so he had been exposed to combat, right? Yeah, probably coincidences.
        Reply
        7 Replies
        
        0%
        disraeli1 month ago
        
        Droppings,
        So everyone in an enemy encampment is guilty of murder? Under the hoary legal tenet guilt by proximity no doubt.
        So everyone exposed to combat because they are wounded is guilty of murder? By what legal precept.
        It doesn't cut it.
        The most logical thing would be to ship him back to Canada and let Canada try him for treason. Canadian troops are in Afganistan and have been since the beginning. Khadr may or may not be guilty of murder (a stretch I think based on the evidence). But, by virtue of his citizenship, he is surely guilty of treason against Canada.
        I don't think you grasp the essence of my argument. It is not that Khadr is some innocent waif, swept up erroneously. Based on what I know about this case he was clearly active in the Taliban, taking up arms against his own country, that being Canada. Whether he put those arms to lethal effect or not, is somewhat irrelevant to a charge of treason.
        Reply
        6 Replies
        
        0%
        disraeli1 month ago
        
        The central point my argument is that if Khadr is to be treated criminally then he is entitled to the protections afforded an accused criminal. The rule of law and the constitution trumps the seemingly exigent circumstances of the moment.
        Further, if he is treated criminally the best evidence available, that of the Special Forces soldier casts a reasonable doubt on who actually threw the grenade that killed Speers. That is the crime (or at least the main crime) that he is accused of. That said, in a properly constituted court of law there is a likelihood that Khadr would walk on that charge. The state cannnot sustain the "beyond a reasonable doubt" burden of proof that is incumbent upon it.
        
        Reply
        5 Replies
        
        0%
        disraeli1 month ago
        
        Whether Khadr was a soldier or acting as a soldier and therefore entitled to the protections of the Geneva Convention is a whole other and completely separate argument. And one that I am sure competent counsel could and would raise in Khadr's defense. If Khadr were found to be a soldier that would effectively render him immune from a charge of murder if that death occurred in the normal course of battle, ie. if it was not the result of an atrocity or a war crime.
        The long and the short of it, Khadr's case is significantly more complex and much grayer than your black and white "being found on the battlefield pulling the pin on a grenade".
        Underlying my entire position is that you can't defend freedoms and rights by denying freedoms and rights. As soon as that happens there is nothing left to defend.
        Reply
        4 Replies
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        The Taliban is a terrorist organization, not a state with a legitimate military. He was a terrorist.
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        0%
        disraeli1 month ago
        
        The Taliban was and/or represented the government of Afganistan at the time that Afganistan was invaded/undermined.
        The Nazi's were the government of Germany during WWII. As reprehensible as their policies and activities were, the men that served in the German forces were treated as soldiers, regardless of the nature of the people that made up the government.
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        The Taliban was actually never given diplomatic recognition by most countries and only seized power with the aid of the Pakistani intelligence agency.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        disraeli1 month ago
        
        UN Security Council resolution 1333, passed in December of 2000, made various demands on the Taliban as the agency in control of about 95% of Afganistan. While official or formal diplomatic recognition was withheld as you point out, the fact of a Security Council resolution held that the Taliban were the responsible party for Afganistan that surely connotes tacit or de facto agreement that the Taliban were the Afgan government.
        The resolution passed unanimously, which would of course include the US.
        Coincidentally this resolution demanded, inter alia, that bin Laden be handed over to the authorities. Such is the weak state of the UN that had this or similar previous resolutions have had any enforcement teeth history might have been significantly different.
        Reply
      - 0%
        chuck-the-canuck1 month, 1 week ago
        
        I assume you're familiar with both. Typical psychotic degenerate.
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        From one to another, Chuck Who Sucks. Degenerate Bolshevik Libbot!
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        chuck-the-canuck1 month ago
        
        I've had chunks in my stools that have had more sophistication and wit than you do.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib1 month ago
        
        I'm quite sure that you find your own feces entertaining.
        Reply
- 0%
  Codi69341 month, 1 week ago
  
  F*ck him, he killed a friend of mine!
  Reply
  18 Replies
  - 0%
    Candida1 month, 1 week ago
    
    Do you know that as a fact, or are you just assuming it? Have your friends killed any Afghans? Do they deserve the same treatment?
    Reply
    17 Replies
    - 0%
      Codi69341 month, 1 week ago
      
      Yes, I do know for a fact! And if this is your ideal of a joke. You are picking a bad subject!
      Reply
      16 Replies
      - 0%
        Candida1 month, 1 week ago
        
        Were you there? Did you see him kill your friend?
        Reply
        15 Replies
        
        0%
        Codi69341 month, 1 week ago
        
        Look here sh*thead! Just because I wasn't there, don't change the fact what two people that were there told me! I have fought in this war and I have buried friends from this war. So F*CK YOU, that little punk was lucky he didn't get a bullet in the head!
        Reply
        14 Replies
        
        0%
        Candida1 month, 1 week ago
        
        Did they see him kill your friend?
        Reply
        13 Replies
        
        0%
        Codi69341 month, 1 week ago
        
        WHAT DID I JUST SAY!! I HAVE ONLY BEEN MAD.ON THIS SITE, ONE TIME BECAUSE SOMEONE MADE A COMMENT ABOUT MY FAMILY. YOU ARE NUMBER TWO!! IF YOU ARE TRYING TO BE FUNNY, YOU ARE PICKING A REAL BAD TIME. CHRIS WAS A GOOD KID(KID TO MY STANDARD). HE WAS KEPTED ON LIFE SUPPORT IN GERMANY UNTIL HIS WIFE WAS FLOWN OVER. THEN IT WAS UNPLUGGED. ALL BECAUSE OF THAT PUNK! THIS WAS A WAR BROUGHT ONTO US, WE NEVER ASKED FOR IT!! INSTEAD OF BEING A COWARD , BEHIND A COMPUTER. KIT UP AND JOIN THE FIGHT OR DO YOU DO YOUR BEST WORK ON THE BACKS OF WHAT OTHERS PROVIDE? YOU ARE P*SSY! AFRAID TO DEFEND A NATION THAT HAS PROVIDED YOU WITH FREEDOM AND LIBERTY. YOU MAKE ME SICK!!
        Reply
        12 Replies
        
        0%
        Candida1 month ago
        
        I'm sorry your friend died. No, I'm not trying to be funny. If the two people you mentioned had actually seen this kid kill your friend, and there is incontrovertible evidence for his guilt, then the administration should have been able to get a conviction for him a long time ago. I suspect that is not the case. Alternatively, the administration is more incompetent that I have thought so far.
        I'm not saying that this kid is innocent, only that he hasn't been found guilty yet. If and when he is convicted, I have no objection to his punishment.
        You say: "THIS WAS A WAR BROUGHT ONTO US, WE NEVER ASKED FOR IT!!" That's not quite correct. Afghanistan has never attacked the US. It was the other way around. Yes, they supported al Quaeda, as did many countries, but they were not the attackers. The Taliban was asking for proof of Osama bin Laden's guilt before they would extradite him. The answer was war.
        Reply
        11 Replies
        
        0%
        Candida1 month ago
        
        You ask why I don't go and fight. Why would I go and fight in a war that I oppose, that I think is unjustified, that I see as a war of aggression?
        You ask: "DO YOU DO YOUR BEST WORK ON THE BACKS OF WHAT OTHERS PROVIDE?"
        Tell me, what do you provide me? Skyrocketing oil prices? A faltering economy? Harassment every time I board an airplane? Since I don't live in the US, fortunately I don't have to share in paying down the huge debt that is being accumulated now. No, you are not keeping me safe. I feel less safe as a result of these wars than I did before them.
        Your nation has not provided freedom and liberty to me, and even the freedom and liberty that you are so proud of are slowly being eroded away. Not only yours, even mine to a lesser extent.
        Reply
        10 Replies
        
        0%
        Codi69341 month ago
        
        This is the problem. We are fighting a war through lawyers. People caught on the batlefield are guilty of conspiracy at the least. If this was so easy to fight in a black and white world. This war would had never started. But we live in a gray area. Dealing with gray characters, fightng a gray war. If 9-11 woud had happened in Paris , London, or Montreal, two things for sure. Those countries would had wanted help from us. Two, the U.S. would had asked to help in a heartbeat. The U.S. have asked for little to nothing in return.
        What we need to do. Is win this war. Then tell everyone to f*ck off, don't call us when you need help from floods, cyclones,famine, earthquakes, or dicators. You solve your own problems. Then we will see what happens!
        Reply
        9 Replies
        
        0%
        Candida1 month ago
        
        Codi6934: "Then tell everyone to f*ck off, don't call us when you need help from floods, cyclones,famine, earthquakes, or dicators. You solve your own problems."
        Not a bad idea. There will be fewer wars. I don't remember the Iraqis asking for help to remove their dictator. As far as natural disasters are concerned, the rest of the world will still help - most of them with no strings attached.
        Reply
        8 Replies
        
        0%
        Codi69341 month ago
        
        In either case, what have we asked for in return?
        Reply
        4 Replies
        
        0%
        Candida1 month ago
        
        Indefinite occupation of Iraq with control of the oil.
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        0%
        Codi69341 month ago
        
        If we want the oil so bad, why are we paying market price for it? It seems that we would get a discount from Iraq. But oil prices dropped ONLY when GW announced that he was lifting the executive ban on off shore drilling.
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        Candida1 month ago
        
        Iraqi oil is not for providing cheap oil for the people but to make a few people very rich. It's safe in the ground right now. It will be even more profitable to sell when it hits $200 or $300 a barrel and when all the oil contracts are in place giving most of the profits to US companies.
        Besides, the US has a hard enough time maintaining its world benefactor image as it is. Imagine what that image would be like if it just took the oil without any compensation.
        The war itself and the resulting volatility of the price of oil is making a lot of people rich too. Consider: if you know that there will be an announcement about drilling, you shortsell oil before the announcement, and you make a bundle when it drops. Alternatively, if you know that there will be an announcement that war with Iran is a distinct possibility, you buy oil and when it skyrockets after the announcement, you pocket the gain.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        Codi69341 month ago
        
        I did take comments you wrote with a grain of salt, until now. That was the dumbest thing you have ever said!
        Reply
        
        0%
        Codi69341 month ago
        
        Even if we left Iraq and Afghanistan today. Look at these sites and see what armed conflicts would be left in the world.
        http://www.warwatch.com/
        http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/crushed-by-war-...
        Fewer wars, no because they would start fighting a civil war. The rest of the world will still be fighting and begging that we send help/aid. We do need to close the purse stings. Then and only then will the world get the message. But the cliche, "Damned if you do,damned if you don't" comes into play.
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        Candida1 month ago
        
        Yes, there would be still too many wars, but fewer. Look back at the last half a century. How many wars has the US been involved in overtly or covertly? How many has it solved satisfactorily?
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        Codi69341 month ago
        
        WWI,WWII,Korea(1/2)Dom Rep(1965) El Sal, Grenade, Panama, Desert Storm, just to name a few. A better question would be how many Democratic presidents took us to a successful conclusion in a time of war or other operation? Not too many!
        Cuba, Vietnam, Angola,Iran, Somilia, Haiti just to name a few!
        Reply
- 0%
  injest1 month, 1 week ago
  
  nikkibabe
  "In this country a murder or rape suspect under 16 is considered a "JUVENILE"."
  And that's why he is facing life in prison vice the death penalty, execution.
  Would you prefer we send him back to Afghanistan as a foreign Taliban/ al-Qaeda fighter?
  That's the ONLY other option. The Canadian citizen is accused of throwing a grenade that killed a US soldier in Afghanistan in 20
  Jurisdiction is American or Afghanistan
  pick one.
  
  Reply
- 0%
  protoham1 month, 1 week ago
  
  But they go to prison as an adult.
  Reply
  6 Replies
  - 0%
    Candida1 month, 1 week ago
    
    After they are convicted.
    Reply
    5 Replies
    - 0%
      eddie1071 month, 1 week ago
      
      In America they are, in the Middle East, that is a very different story, they could be stoned to death, hung, or a very popular one is to cut his head of and drag his body through the streets with children riding his corpse.
      Reply
      4 Replies
      - 0%
        Candida1 month, 1 week ago
        
        Guantanamo is not in the Middle East, and it's not controlled by any Middle Eastern country, but by a country that prides itself of liberty and justice.
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        0%
        disraeli1 month, 1 week ago
        
        Prided Candida, past tense. Very past. Very tense.
        Reply
        
        0%
        eddie1071 month ago
        
        So it is ok for Satan to butcher children, but if Jesus shoplifts a piece of bubblegum, he should be bullwhipped? Your double-standards are extremely obvious and transparent.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        Candida1 month ago
        
        Oh, I don't approve of their methods, but who am I to tell them how to live in their own country? The US still executes people and imprisons more per capita than any other country, but I won't go protesting about that either. It's none of my business. The most I'll do about it is express an opinion.
        Invading two countries and causing the death, injury, and displacement of millions of people, locking up people in Gitmo for years without any charge, torturing prisoners, and trampling on human rights, just to mention a few things, is hardly shoplifting a piece of bubble gum. Not that there is much in common between the US and Jesus in general.
        Reply
- 0%
  Global_Warmer1 month, 1 week ago
  
  Showing off your incredible stupidity again.
  Reply
- 0%
  Global_Warmer1 month, 1 week ago
  
  "In this country a murder or rape suspect under 16 is considered a "JUVENILE"."
  You are so WRONG! In this country, if you commit murder at 16 you are automatically waived into the adult system. You just continue to show your ignorance to the point that your stupid remarks have become insulting to everyone's intelligence. Please stay away from the computer.
  Reply
  4 Replies
  - 0%
    Candida1 month, 1 week ago
    
    He was 15.
    Reply
  - 0%
    eddie1071 month, 1 week ago
    
    Dude, your attempt at sounding super intelligent is like watching a fish run the Boston marathon.
    Reply
    2 Replies
    - 0%
      Global_Warmer1 month, 1 week ago
      
      Is everyone living in Alameda as cognitively challenged as you? You would think by 31 you'd have at least half your brain functioning.
      Reply
      1 Reply
      - 0%
        eddie1071 month ago
        
        Where in the world did you get 31? I have a Nephew working in Iraq rebuilding roads. I fear desperately for his safety, but he feels good about the people he is helping, and the contribution he is making to the world.
        BTW, most adults are aware that the average person uses less than 10% of thier brain, so I would be pretty freakin awesome if I could do the 50% level wouldnt you say?
        Reply
0%
unome21 month, 1 week ago

I don't believe a person could possibly hate their country anymore than I hate mine right now.
And I live in New York City and lost friends on 9-11.
Reply
32 Replies
- 0%
  MajJohn1 month, 1 week ago
  
  Too bad, go somewhere else if it bothers you so.
  Reply
- 0%
  gamahuche1 month, 1 week ago
  
  Reading most of the other posts here does make one wonder what the heck happened to the marvellous USA that its represented by such cowardly shameful cretins.
  Reply
  3 Replies
  - 0%
    saintetienne1 month, 1 week ago
    
    "Reading most of the other posts here does make one wonder what the heck happened to the marvellous USA that its represented by such cowardly shameful cretins."
    Yes, but it wouldn't be humane to execute the loudmouth, idiot Libs who diss their own country and call for immediate retreat and surrender from Iraq. Hey - maybe we could herd them all into Canada?.... They would appreciate the Socialist-like system that's in place there better, anyway.
    I'm all for pooling some tax dollars together to move these Liberal fools out of the U.S. and into Canada. Anybody with me?
    Reply
    2 Replies
    - 0%
      HannibalBarca1 month, 1 week ago
      
      Sorry NUMPTY; Much as we would like to, we can not take in 295 million Americans, but thank you for your concern.
      Reply
      1 Reply
      - 0%
        splitrch1 month, 1 week ago
        
        come on now, died-in-the-wool bushbots make up roughly 28%. That's a far cry fro 295 million.
        Reply
- 0%
  rightfromwrong1 month, 1 week ago
  
  Why would anyone like the USA after all that is happened in the Bush years. 9/11 was an inside job.
  I am sorry that you lost friends on 9/11
  Reply
  5 Replies
  - 0%
    buckncindykill1 month, 1 week ago
    
    My relatives in Germany, Poland and Russia love the USA. Do they count?
    Reply
    1 Reply
    - 0%
      Candida1 month, 1 week ago
      
      Most things looks pretty good from a distance.

Hello!

'First Guantanamo video' released »

Scale of 1 to 10

Click Prop It to Raise Score

Read Full Story at news.bbc.co.uk

Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 275

hsaleem1 month, 1 week ago

MajJohn1 month, 1 week ago

Candida1 month, 1 week ago

Blackacereturn1 month ago

protoham1 month, 1 week ago

eddie1071 month, 1 week ago

chuck-the-canuck1 month, 1 week ago

eddie1071 month, 1 week ago

chuck-the-canuck1 month, 1 week ago

eddie1071 month ago

eddie1071 month ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

Candida1 month, 1 week ago

eddie1071 month ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

Candida1 month ago

DropkickaLib1 month, 1 week ago

Candida1 month, 1 week ago

eddie1071 month, 1 week ago

Candida1 month, 1 week ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

nikkibabe1 month, 1 week ago

pc251 month, 1 week ago

rightfromwrong1 month, 1 week ago

pc251 month, 1 week ago

DropkickaLib1 month, 1 week ago

eddie1071 month, 1 week ago

Candida1 month, 1 week ago

eddie1071 month, 1 week ago

Candida1 month, 1 week ago

kobzikov1 month, 1 week ago

eddie1071 month ago

kobzikov1 month ago

Dionys1 month, 1 week ago

DropkickaLib1 month, 1 week ago

Global_Warmer1 month, 1 week ago

Candida1 month, 1 week ago

disraeli1 month, 1 week ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

disraeli1 month ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

disraeli1 month ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

disraeli1 month ago

disraeli1 month ago

disraeli1 month ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

disraeli1 month ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

disraeli1 month ago

chuck-the-canuck1 month, 1 week ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

chuck-the-canuck1 month ago

DropkickaLib1 month ago

Codi69341 month, 1 week ago

Candida1 month, 1 week ago

Codi69341 month, 1 week ago

Candida1 month, 1 week ago

Codi69341 month, 1 week ago

Candida1 month, 1 week ago

Codi69341 month, 1 week ago

Candida1 month ago

Candida1 month ago

Codi69341 month ago

Candida1 month ago

Codi69341 month ago

Candida1 month ago

Codi69341 month ago

Candida1 month ago

Codi69341 month ago

Codi69341 month ago