Ron Paul Revolution March TODAY »
Posted By ecotourusa 3 months ago in NewsThis was a March held today in DC on the Mall of capitol! This was not covered by Main Stream Controlled Media. but, here is one of the first videos out from Today's festivities. Please check it out and comment. All of your comments are important!
Read Full Story at youtube.com »
Submitted By:
ecotourusa
I support Ron Paul ideology . His concepts will restore our personal freedoms. With over 30 years experience, He is skilled and fiscally responsible to lead ...
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 111
-
0%
ecotourusa3 months ago
As far as I can tell, at least 6,000 people descended upon and marched on the Mall in WAshington DC today. No major networks carried it. (Amazing)
Reply-
0%
GHOSTWHOWALKS3 months ago
Not really all that surprising when you considering the MSM have already conditioned the populace that there is only two choices come November. They'll (MSM) never cover Ron Paul because he speaks the truth and they prefer the flip flopping lies of Le McMuffette, the betrayal of Obama, and furthering their own agenda.
I wonder what would happen if every registered voter said no to both the idiots and wrote in Dr. Paul? What would the media do then?
Reply-
0%
ecotourusa3 months ago
wow. GHOST-
maybe we could start our own movement to write in RON PAUL!
the other 2 candidates are an embarrassment to the USA!
(many Europeans support Ron Paul and yearn to learn more and more about him)
Reply -
0%
ecotourusa3 months ago
Naomi Wolf was there...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fGc6auB4j8
She has a strong message. (I dare you to watch it, Oscar)
:)
Enjoy your Sunday. make it beautiful.
Reply
-
-
Luis-CiferComment removed: User banned.1 Reply
-
-
0%
rightfromwrong3 months ago
Ron Paul offers Americans hope and logic which are against the forces of evil. When 95% of the media is controlled by the right-wing fascist Bilderbergs then you won't see any coverage. Americans need to take back their country.
I had some hope for Obama but when both he and Hillary addressed AIPAC one day after she conceded, it certainly is a telling story.
Reply -
0%
Goppy3 months ago
Far as I can tell ... most Right Leaning Poeple really don't liek Johnny McCain.
They call him a RINO ... a "Republican In Name Only".
Maybe they would feel more content if they voted for Ron Paul. I mean, between, McCain, Romney, Giulianni, Thompson and the rest ... he IS the only TRUE Republican - with traditional Republican values.
Reply -
0%
rightfromwrong3 months ago
I went to Ottawa to protest the "3 amigos" Bush, Harper and Calderon and their SPP which is a further extension of NAFTA.
Their goal is the NAU. In Ottawa they had about 1,500 police many with handi-cams and there were only 4,000 demonstrators.
On the last day they march to Gatineau and the Surete which is the Quebec provincial policy tried to incite trouble by having 3 guys come out of the bush, one threatening the guards with a rock. All the regulars were pointing at them and yelling at them that they were not part of them. Anyway it was all caught on tape and these clowns had on the some of the same clothes as the guards.....needless to say the Chief of the Surete came out after first denying it but later recanted by saying " oh yes we do this all the time...try to infiltrate them. Obviously to discredit them!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=St1-WTc1kow
http://youtube.com/watch?v=7S1nHvvkzvA&feature=...
Reply-
0%
ecotourusa3 months ago
rightfromwrong-
did you notice the lack of coverage on this main event??
Our country is being dangerously sold out...and there was no truthful news about it.
Reply
-
-
0%
1-2-Oscar3 months ago
I'll be frank. I don't like Ron Paul, and I think that he would be a disastrous choice for President.
Why? Because he has a "one size fits all" solution to what ails us, and such simplicity is simply a fantasy. I would prefer a leader with the range to address the variety of problems which a President must face in all their complexity--and Ron Paul REFUSES to do it.
Are Obama and McCain better candidates? I think that Obama is better, if only because he will draw into government men and women who are capable, who are willing to CHANGE direction from policies that have failed, and who are not the servants of the past three Presidents, who have all been spectacular disappointments, if not outright failures.
A government which responds to the needs of the people and ACTS on their behalf is necessary. Ron Paul thinks that government can withdraw from active participation in the economy, in education, in Social Security, and in the lives of the people generally.
Reply-
0%
1-2-Oscar3 months ago
That seems to me a recipe for disaster. I consider myself a pretty large and capable competitor, but I don't want to live in a nation where "dog-eat-dog" is not only the norm, but where the biggest dogs will become the rulers of the rest. I perceive that that is precisely the sort of world that Ron Paul and the "true Libertarians" would like to create, and I will fight to keep them from doing so.
Reply-
0%
ecotourusa3 months ago
We need to Stop the North American Union.
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com
both mccain and obama are pro amnesty. they are setting the stage for this travesty.
mccain and obama are 2 sides to the SAME COIN! Obama is a traitor...he voted in support of FISA...next will be a federal ID.
Reply -
0%
raza93 months ago
"A government which responds to the needs of the people and ACTS on their behalf is necessary. Ron Paul thinks that government can withdraw from active participation in the economy, in education, in Social Security, and in the lives of the people generally."
So, do you believe the government has been doing a bang up job in the areas of education, social security, and in defending our Liberties?
The truth is, that the Constitution is itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, A BILL OF RIGHTS.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
1-2-Oscar3 months ago
I don't think that I'm naive. I know that the prevailing opinion was that the government had no authority to "interfere" in the economy, in relationships between employer and employee, and in the regulation of business. The result was the fantastic concentration of wealth which occurred in the last third of the nineteenth century, the steady deflation of the money which robbed workers and farmers of the fruits of their labor and submitted them to grinding poverty, and the control of the government by a select few--the wealthy.
A similar situation is not far away today, and the policy of withdrawal and inactivity that Ron Paul would impose on the government would simply be an abandonment of responsibility and a surrender of all REAL POWER to the most wealthy and unscrupulous.
Reply -
0%
PsychoHosebeast3 months ago
Talk about naive... a vote for Ron Paul is a wasted vote. Period. What do you expect--even the loser of the two major parties will outnumber votes for Ron Paul about 1000:1. A truly sad comment, but it's the way it is. Don't be telling people they're naive until you've talked to your therapist.
Reply -
0%
bruhaha3 months ago
What is naive, is to believe that if the government will remove itself from any control of economy through regulations, etc. the corporations will act in the best interest of the people, thereby forgoing excessive profits.
This belief ignores the fact that corporations are in the business to make money.
Reply
-
-
0%
raza93 months ago
Oscar - "Because he has a "one size fits all" solution to what ails us"
I do believe Freedom and Liberty is suited to "fit all". The Constitution was designed to protect and defend those ideals.
An ELECTIVE DESPOTISM was not the government our Founding Fathers envisioned.
Reply
-
