Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 122

• 0%

  nikkibabe4 months, 3 weeks ago

  Hold it Osama. John McCain says he is coming after you and will either capture you or leave you dead by 2013!. Could you lend him a "walker" or "crutches" so he does not fall off the mountain cliffs in Western Pakistan? If he cannot do it, he has promised to check in to a Nursing Home and leave you alone.

  Reply

  30 Replies

  • 0%

    PsychoHosebeast4 months, 3 weeks ago

    Will McCain even live five more years?

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      capecoralM4 months, 3 weeks ago

      Bin Laden has been dead for many years. Look at this picture from 2001 and then compare to any videos since. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osama_dead.html

      Reply
  • 0%

    ETproductions4 months, 3 weeks ago

    Yeah, I remember Bush's bluster too. "He can run but he can't hide." Said 7 years ago. Bush outsourced the pursuit to a rag-tag group of Afghan warlords to keep bin Laden safe and sound so he could trot him out every time he needed a boogeyman to terrify the American public into letting him have his way.

    Reply

    14 Replies

    • 0%

      UnusualSuspect4 months, 3 weeks ago

      Exactly! Well said, ET...

      We let bin Laden go and pursue Saddam Hussein...that makes sense, right? Seven years later, still no bin Laden, and we're stuck in Iraq with no easy way out.

      Great thinkers and leaders we have in this country of ours...

      Reply

      12 Replies

      • 0%

        vor4 months, 3 weeks ago

        It does make sense if you realize that Bin Laden actually gave the neocons what they asked for...a New Pearl Harbor. They knew they could never implement the plans drawn up at PNAC without such an event. Note that once these plans were implemented within months Bush's approval nosedived, never to revive. Meaningless to Cheney and his brood. I am sure when Georgie came crying he simply told him: "So?"

        Reply

        11 Replies

        • 0%

          antibrainwasher4 months, 3 weeks ago

          Really....so what George, the polls don't matter, Haliburton profit is up 50%, oil is soaring, the rich are richer and with no inheritance tax, Haliburton is now headquartered in Dubai with no American Taxes to pay, just collect the taxes in no bid contracts.....

          who cares about the polls from cannon fodder?

          Reply
        • 0%

          markmawn24 months, 3 weeks ago

          Recall that Bin Laden also wanted Bush re-elected. Most likely because he has fulfilled every one of his prophecies and will most likely continue to do so.

          http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO410B.html

          This must be better than candy and sex to Osama.

          Reply
        • 0%

          vor4 months, 3 weeks ago

          Hey NOSPIN DAVE. Your negs are completely meaningless without a corresponding opinion. Pretty hard to refute the obvious, eh? I would hate to be in your shoes having to defend these scoundrels.

          Reply
        • 0%

          libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

          "They knew they could never implement the plans drawn up at PNAC without such an event. Note that once these plans were implemented within months Bush's approval nosedived, never to revive.

          Pretty nutty for someone claiming to be a "voice of reason." Bush's approval ratings were in the 90th percentile after Saddam was taken down and Afghanistan liberated. It wasn't until Iraqis started killing each other that things headed south.

          Add to that the false blame he's taken for Hurricane Katrina and an up-and-down economy, and you begin to understand why he's taking so much blame. Intersting to note: The Dem-controlled Congress continually lags lower than the President in approval ratings. So much for those jackasses.

          Reply

          7 Replies

          • 0%

            splitrch4 months, 3 weeks ago

            Sorry Libs. I didn't mean to give you a positive. I meant to click the reply button instead.... oh well

            Your comment:

            "Intersting to note: The Dem-controlled Congress continually lags lower than the President in approval ratings. So much for those jackasses."

            The reason the numbers are low is because they were elected to end the war and the Bush Presidency. They didn't come through so people aren't happy with them. This does not bode well for the Republicans in November.

            Reply

            2 Replies

            • 0%

              Mdiar4 months, 3 weeks ago

              Or Democratic incumbents.

              Reply

              1 Reply

              • 0%

                splitrch4 months, 3 weeks ago

                We should regularly throw incumbents out the door until they understand all the corporate money in the world won't get them reelected. We should also deny health benefits to all elected officials until they give us what they have available to them.

                Reply
          • 0%

            ETproductions4 months, 3 weeks ago

            Osama taken down? HA! What absurdity. He's in the strongest position he has ever been in thanks to the monumental foreign policy blunders of you Republicans over the past 7 years.

            Reply
          • 0%

            Lurch4 months, 3 weeks ago

            false blame for Katrina?? Clinton and Bush Sr both gave up biz trips for hurricanes or impending natural disasters, before they happened.

            Bush Jr, went golfing. You know, that game Jr gave up as a sacrifice to show support for US troops before he didn`t actually give it up.

            The Congress has so low ratings because the cons are filibustering and blocking what America voted in the Dems to do. Hence, three special elections in Republican districts have all gone to the Dems.

            Bush`s approval ratings were a call for unity post 9/11. They starting going downhill as soon as he took two months to do a thing and then when he let obl go free, and then when he illegally diverted funds from Afghanistan to Iraq, etc.

            In other words, the high ratings were none of his own doing, but the low ratings are a true reflection of his incompetence and failures.

            How many times do you have to be used b4 you get it?

            Reply

            2 Replies

            • 0%

              ETproductions4 months, 3 weeks ago

              Don't you just love it when the Cons here can't even rebut a word of the truth in your post, so they are left sending in their drive be neggers to give you a neg vote without comment?

              Reply
            • 0%

              jordan114 months, 3 weeks ago

              You said that very well.

              Reply
    • 0%

      markoller4 months, 3 weeks ago

      .

      Reply
  • 0%

    Global_Warmer4 months, 3 weeks ago

    Does his health status have any affect on him ordering a handful of terrorists to use our skyscrapers as landing strips or 747's? What he needs is a cruz missle shoved up his ass.

    Reply

    7 Replies

    • 0%

      vor4 months, 3 weeks ago

      Clinton gave that a try on August 19th, 1998 but received nothing but condemnation (he was "Wagging the Dog", he blew up an aspirin factory!). He almost got OBL. Never gets any credit for the attempt.

      As for your question. If he is in fact dead, yes, it does make a difference. And if that is the case who is speaking on these mysterious messages that seem to be so well timed. Because of his apparent operational ineffectiveness (living high in the mountains with no electronic communication) it should take days, even weeks, for him to get a message out of Waziristan.

      Reply

      6 Replies

      • 0%

        Global_Warmer4 months, 3 weeks ago

        What the hell are you talking about????? Clinton was offered Bin Laden on a silver platter, but wouldn't leave the f--king golf course.

        Reply

        5 Replies

        • 0%

          libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

          Shhhh ... GW, don't try using "reason" on an unbalanced individual.

          Reply
        • 0%

          vor4 months, 3 weeks ago

          That is purely your revisionist history and of course it is totally incorrect and deceptive. Are you an IDIOT! And some other f-ckin' idiot gave you a positive as well! You revisionists will not take over this world. Orwell warned us about you long ago. You would however make a good employee at the Ministry of Truth...you are the type of American that is destroying this country...slowly but surely...

          Reply

          3 Replies

          • 0%

            Global_Warmer4 months, 3 weeks ago

            Actually, for years I've been trying to figure out who the bigger idiot is: Clinton, or the ones that supported him. You just cleared that up for me. Thanks.

            Reply
          • 0%

            nostalgia4 months, 3 weeks ago

            Have you read "Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised National Security" by Lt. Col Robert Patterson

            The account in the book was disputed by Sandy Berger

            We all know what a credible source Berger is, right?

            Reply

            1 Reply

            • 0%

              vor4 months, 3 weeks ago

              Yes, I have read that book. It is purely a biased account of the Clinton presidency. Anyone with the nickname "Buzz" has to be taken somewhat lightly. I have plenty of issues with the way Clinton conducted himself. Ignoring OBL is not one of them.

              The fact that Clinton actually took action against OBL seems to completely escape the both of you. As does the fact that Bush/Cheney seem not the least bit concerned by his continued existence. You are living in a world of smoke and mirrors.

              Reply
  • 0%

    Teech4 months, 3 weeks ago

    I'm almost as tired of this goat f*cking rag head as I am of his pals Bush and Cheney.

    Reply
  • 0%

    capecoralM4 months, 3 weeks ago

    .

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      MilesAway4 months, 3 weeks ago

      Dear 'capecoralM' ???? What is your POST???? In my screen, I got 'ZIP" NADA, ziro.

      Reply
  • 0%

    Endoscopy4 months, 3 weeks ago

    nikkibabe

    I take it you think Osama is a big hero. You believe in what he stands for.

    Lets see. He is a true believer so you better become a good Muslim or die. That is the choice he is giving you. People of the Book are many times allowed to live under Islam provided they pay jizya.

    Quran 9:29 Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His apostle nor acknowledge the religion of truth (even if they are) of the People of the Book until they pay the Jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.

    The Jizya had to be paid individually at a humiliating public ceremony to remind the Dhimmis (protected people), that they are inferior to the believers, that is, the Muslims.

    Reply
  • 0%

    jordan114 months, 3 weeks ago

    Foul. John McCain is hardly ancient. Can't ya'll do better than attack his age?

    Reply
• 0%

  djn3nunez34 months, 3 weeks ago

  From our flip-flopper in chief.

  "But one of the things for certain is we're going to get him running and keep him running, and bring him to justice. And that's what's happening. He's on the run, if he's running at all. So we don't know whether he's in cave with the door shut, or a cave with the door open -- we just don't know...."

  - Bush, in remarks in a Press Availablity with the Press Travel Pool,

  The Prairie Chapel Ranch, Crawford TX, 12/28/01, as reported on

  official White House site

  "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."

  - G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

  "I am truly not that concerned about him."

  - G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,

  3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)

  * * *

  Reply
• 0%

  unome24 months, 3 weeks ago

  It is so wonderful to see Bush and Cheney's dear dear friend and colleague Osama back in the news.

  Maybe they could all get together and count their war profits.

  Reply

  4 Replies

  • 0%

    ZenAgain4 months, 3 weeks ago

    They'll need both hands for that.....

    Reply

    3 Replies

    • 0%

      ZenAgain4 months, 3 weeks ago

      Thanks for the neg's guys. We call that one an 'F18'.

      Goes way over your head before you've even seen it.

      Reply

      2 Replies

      • 0%

        BronxBomber4 months, 3 weeks ago

        Zen You're back? Where you been dude! You were missed!

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 0%

          ZenAgain4 months, 3 weeks ago

          Awwww shucks BB, right back at ya. I spent my time convalescing after a bizarre Combine harvesting machine accident which seriously affected my typing fingers.

          But you're never too far away really in our little global cyber-world.

          Reply
• 0%

  Dicax_Maximus4 months, 3 weeks ago

  Forget the politics for a moment, until this noisome little worm (OBL) and ALL his ilk are removed from this planet, nobody can ever consider themselves safe (in ANY major city, plane, train or boat).....

  I don't care what country, agency, president or armed force gets OBL & his mob, just as long as they are ALL got...

  In case you hadn't noticed, I don't like terrorists.......

  Reply

  2 Replies

  • 0%

    ETproductions4 months, 3 weeks ago

    Me either. And judging from how many innocent people the kill and maim, they feel the same about us.

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      BronxBomber4 months, 3 weeks ago

      The only thing I wanna hear from this turd OBL is a death rattle, and take Bush and Cheney with him.

      Reply
• 0%

  Teagen4 months, 3 weeks ago

  So why is it the press can find OBL but our CIA can't? Tell you what, let's sell off the CIA and buy CNN.

  Reply

  1 Reply

  • 0%

    BB644 months, 3 weeks ago

    I agree. How can some moron hiding in caves in the mountains in Pakistan and Afghanistan yet the press continues to get tapes and videos? Better yet, why bother reporting what this jack has to say?

    Reply
• 0%

  obiefrommuskogee4 months, 3 weeks ago

  Why does it say "from a person that goes by the name Mansfield?"

  THis whole story sounds like Israeli propaganda. If Mansfield was an agent, they certainly wouldn't say that- it would be giving away their established identity.

  Its sounds like "Mansfield" does not exist in real life. Then the story is not creditable at all.

  Reply

  13 Replies

  • 0%

    walden34 months, 3 weeks ago

    How does the story benefit Israel?

    Reply

    12 Replies

    • 0%

      Dionys4 months, 3 weeks ago

      "How does the story benefit Israel? "

      Beats the drums of "Israel is in danger" and gets all the "Israel is the victim" people up in arms and ready to invade whatever country BushCo's evanglical buddies say should be next.

      Reply

      11 Replies

      • 0%

        walden34 months, 3 weeks ago

        I think it works against Israel by getting Americans to say, 'we're sick and tired of sending our money to that crazy place. maybe if we stopped supporting Israel so openly we'd be safer.'

        Which side of the line do you fall on, drum beater or anti-interventionist?

        Me? I'd like to see us less involved everywhere but in the USA.

        Reply

        9 Replies

        • 0%

          pcknowledge4 months, 3 weeks ago

          I believe it helps Israel because McCain will get all the Jewish votes & the Jewish lobby will back him even more.

          Which they are going to do even without these supposed pending messages.

          I for one believe BL is dead.

          I've found the majority of people here are to uninformed to understand how much our government's support of Israel costs us in terms of $'s & even military spending. Our government should be focused on making America a better place for us, not anything else. We should not be supporting Israel, or any other country, for that matter. The focus of our government should be taking care of us and of America, first and foremost.

          Reply

          8 Replies

          • 0%

            walden34 months, 3 weeks ago

            You will not find a more solidly Democratic voting block then the Jewish vote, other than the Black vote of course. 75% of American Jews vote Democratic. Of course Reverend Wright has scared off some of the Jewish vote. If Obama is the nominee, as is likely, you will see a lot of Jews voting for McCain or staying home.

            What we give out in foreign aid is peanuts though compared to what we spend in Iraq, which is about $2B a week. I think the US gives out about $10B in foreign aid a year. The largest shares are $3B to Israel and $2B to Egypt.

            Pretty good website.

            http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Debt/U...

            We agree that the US has to focus more at home and less abroad. I was surprised to see that we give out less as a % than many other countries.

            Reply

            2 Replies

            • 0%

              pcknowledge4 months, 3 weeks ago

              I think the majority of the Jewish population in the US will vote for McCain. I also believe the Jewish lobbyists will vote & support McCain. In my viewpoint, McCain would be 4 more yrs of Bush, which we can't afford.

              As far as foreign aid is concerned, I'm not to concerned about which country we spend (more) on. That's not the real problem. I'm against spending on any foreign country, period. Unless a real natural disaster happens somewhere in a poverty stricken country whose government has a good human rights record (to ensure the civilians will benefit from the aid) & our government is helping with emergency aid. Maybe they could pay us back with free oranges or at least something.

              Other then that, we have our own problems with lack of funding into our infrastructure, public school system, ss system, etc.

              Reply
            • 0%

              hyperbola4 months, 3 weeks ago

              We have been giving less foreign aid as a percentage of GDP than many other countries ever since Reagan. At the same time, the sales of taxpayer-subsidized weapons to foreign countries has grown enormously to provide the kickbacks for our corrupt defense industries.

              On the other hand, we provide zionism with many other forms of aid and their cost to the US has grown prohibitive.

              Washington Report on Middle East Affairs

              Special Report

              The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: $3 Trillion

              http://www.wrmea.com/archives/june2003/0306020....

              Reply
          • 0%

            newbie04204 months, 3 weeks ago

            Here's a chart you can share with those uninformed people, scroll down to CRS-13:

            http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/319...

            2004's top foreign aid recipients:

            Iraq-18.44 billion

            Israel-2.62 billion

            Egypt-1.87 billion

            Afghan-1.77 billion

            Lot's of other good info in there as well.

            Reply

            4 Replies

            • 0%

              pcknowledge4 months, 3 weeks ago

              "Here's a chart you can share with those uninformed people, scroll down to CRS-13:"

              You only presented one chart. There are so many conflicting charts and #'s out there, which differ from each other. Also, I wouldn't count Iraq as our government actually invaded the country, killed thousands of innocent Iraqi civlians, destroyed their infrastructure.

              Reply

              3 Replies

              • 0%

                newbie04204 months, 3 weeks ago

                LOL

                Was trying to be nice and you respond by negging my comment and being a prick about it.

                If you bothered to check the link there's actually multiple charts and detailed explanations....

                Reply
              • 0%

                pcknowledge4 months, 3 weeks ago

                I did check the link. I believe the charts are outdated & inaccurate. Bush has spend a lot more in the last 4 yrs.

                "Foreign Aid: An Introductory Overview of

                U.S. Programs and Policy

                Updated April 15, 2004"

                But, that's based on my own research. I won't neg you next time I disagree with one of your posts. Hope that makes you feel better. Have a nice afternoon.

                Reply

                1 Reply

                • 0%

                  blowback4 months, 3 weeks ago

                  pcknowledge is correct.

                  Invasion, occupation and war

                  do not constitute 'Foreign Aid.'

                  Reply
      • 0%

        Mutainia4 months, 3 weeks ago

        Bin Laden sure is evil sounding. He must be reading the English versions of the Quran (Pickthal, Shakir, Ali)...NOT the original classical ARABic one. :)

        Reply
• 0%

  alexdel4 months, 3 weeks ago

  oh! Bad news,i hope don'n have bad even again.

  Reply

• ML2007Comment removed: User banned.18 Replies

  • 0%

    libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

    Ahh yes, another maniacal, racist rant from a complete lunatic.

    Reply

    4 Replies

    • 0%

      markoller4 months, 3 weeks ago

      How is your eyesight? Osama bin Laden looked like a walking corpse late in 2001, and none of imposters remotely resembles the real Osama. Don't ask me why they can't find someone more convincing. The CIA might as well have hired a Chinese midget to play the part.

      Reply
    • 0%

      markoller4 months, 3 weeks ago

      LibsRfunny,

      How is your eyesight? Osama bin Laden looked like a cadaver by late 2001, and none of the actors in the Osama videos remotely resembles the real Osama. Don't ask me why no one could find a more convincing imposter. The CIA might as well have hired a Chinese midget to play the part.

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 0%

        markoller4 months, 3 weeks ago

        My first post vanished, and now it reappears.

        Reply

    • ML2007Comment removed: User banned.
  • 0%

    antibrainwasher4 months, 3 weeks ago

    ML, you are absolutely correct, and you must ask why this idiotic periodic apperance by the no doubt dead Bin Ladin is covered extensively in the 100% Jewish owned and Jewish controlled American media?

    Reply

    5 Replies

    • 0%

      libsRfunny4 months, 3 weeks ago

      "...100% Jewish owned and Jewish controlled American media?"

      Ohh my, more rampant racism from the lefties.

      Reply

      4 Replies

      • 0%

        hyperbola4 months, 3 weeks ago

        Well, here is a jewish reaction to your comment.

        The loathsome smearing of Israel's critics

        Religion â;; In the US and Britain, there is a campaign to smear anybody who tries to describe the plight of the Palestinian people. It is an attempt to intimidate and silence â⻬" and to a large degree, it works. There is nobody these self-appointed spokesmen for Israel will not attack as anti-Jewish: liberal Jews, rabbis, even Holocaust survivors.

        http://religion.propeller.com/story/2008/05/10/...

        Reply

        2 Replies

        • 0%

          hyperbola4 months, 3 weeks ago

          How do you explain the fact that the US media does not tell us about failed propaganda campaigns by zionist general Petraeus?

          al-Maliki Stalls U.S. Plan on Iran Arms

          ..The Bush administration and top Iraq commander Gen. David Petraeus had plotted a sequence of events that would build domestic U.S. political support for a possible strike against Iran over its "meddling" in Iraq and especially its alleged export of arms to Shiite militias.

          The plan was keyed to a briefing document to be prepared by Petraeus on the alleged Iranian role in arming and training Shiite militias that would be surfaced publicly after the al-Maliki government had endorsed it and it used to accuse Iran publicly....

          ... But for the media blackout of the story, the large EFP discovery in Karbala would have further undermined the credibility of the U.S. military's line on Iran's export of the EFPs to Iraqi fighters...

          http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42373

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 0%

            hyperbola4 months, 3 weeks ago

            General Petraeus: Zionism's Military Poodle

            ... The gap between Petraeus' 'theoretical' discourse on politics and his practice of prioritizing military victory can be explained by his desire to please Bush-Zioncons in Washington in order to advance his own military career (and future political ambitions). The result was an exceptionally mediocre military performance, underwritten by dismal political failures and the achievement of his personal ambitions...

            .. Petraeus' promotion, just days after his testimony pointing to war with Iran could not be attributed to his (failed) military performance, but to his slavish adherence to Bush's and Israel's push for heightened confrontation with Iran. Blaming Iran for his failed military policies served a double purpose: it covered up his incompetence and it secured the support of leading Zionist Senators like Joseph Lieberman...

            http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/05/general-p...

            Reply
      • 0%

        markoller4 months, 3 weeks ago

        LibsRfunny,

        Alright, nothing is 100% owned and controlled by Jews, but Judaism is racism itself, and your accusation of racism is a diversionary tactic. See "Examples of Hate Speech." http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/palestinians....

        Reply
  • 0%

    Endoscopy4 months, 3 weeks ago

    How come nobody talks about the Islam imperialism. They started in Medina and captured caravans to provide booty so they could get more arms and members that liked getting booty. The Jews in Medina that were under a treaty were either told to leave with what they could carry or 1 tribe the men were killed and the women and children made slaves. After making a treat with Mecca he invaded with an army of 10,000 when they were thinking peace. He then captured Arabia by ordering the Jews and Christians to leave or die and then sent his army sometimes with himself leading to go to one town after the other and give the option of converting or be attacked in three days. After taking Arabia he sent letters to the Roman Emperor, Persian emperor, and others to convert to Islam if they wanted peace. He died shortly after taking Tobuk part of the Roman empire.

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      Endoscopy4 months, 3 weeks ago

      After he died Islam conquered by the sword everything in the middle East, northern Africa, west through Northern India, north through Spain stopped at Tours France, north to Vienna being thrown back there, and taking most of the Mediterranean Islands. They held part of Italy for a while and Greece for a while.

      Everybody rants about the Crusades but never talk about the horrible attacks that Muslims did against these people. Even against people of the Book most of the time they went in killing everybody in sight so they could take the booty. Egypt fought ferociously to prevent it before falling to the onslaught. Other places did as well. Much of the area was Christian and most of them were killed.

      In Islam if an area was conquered for Islam then it is a disgrace for it to be removed from them. Thus the biggest problem of Israel. There is no solution acceptable to Muslims except to kill all the Jews there and rule it with Sharia law. That is why he will talk about Israel.

      Reply
  • 0%

    Thinker224 months, 3 weeks ago

    > Does this play into the hands of Christian Zionists and the US Imperialistic goals of controlling the ME? I think his timing is perfect if you are one of the Zionists or Imperialists.

    As a matter of fact, the Arabs always played perfectly into the hands of Zionists (Christian or otherwise) and the US Imperialistic goals of controlling the ME.

    It happened back in 1948 when they've rejected the UN Partition Resolution, started a war and lost allowing Israel to take more lands than UN initially planned to.

    It happened again in 1967 when President Nasser started another war against Israel and lost allowing Israel to occupy territories three times larger than the entire Israel prior to the war.

    It happened in 1973... and in 1978... and in 1982... and in August, 2000.

    It happened on 9/11/2001 when Arab terrorists murdered 3,000 Americans drugging this great nation into a war where it fights terrorism side-by-side with Israel.

    Reply

    4 Replies

    • 0%

      blowback4 months, 3 weeks ago

      You've made a very important point.

      Land is seized by war.

      Land is lost by war.

      People hate and die, either way.

      The more that land is seized or lost

      the more people hate and die.

      A self-perpetuating paradigm.

      Your one-eyed perspective illustrates this.

      Reply

      2 Replies

      • 0%

        Thinker224 months, 3 weeks ago

        > You've made a very important point.

        Thank you. This is what I usually do.

        > Your one-eyed perspective illustrates this.

        I'm not sure what your point here was. Are you trying to say that SOME people (in this case, Israelis) are supposed to die PRIOR to seizing land so those hating them will have no one to hate?

        In any case, the "other eye" perspective I did not include in my post is that in 1978 Egyptian President Sadat declared the willingness to make peace with Israel... and got back all lands his predecessor Gamal Abdel Nasser lost 10 years earlier in a war.

        Reply
      • 0%

        Thinker224 months, 3 weeks ago

        In case you did not get my very important point here it is again:

        You lose in war.

        You win in peace.

        One side can start a war.

        Both sides are needed for peace.

        As long as the Arabs in general and Palestinian Arabs, in particular, prefer war over peace they'll have what they ask for and they'll continue to lose becasue they CAN afford to lose.

        They've always lost. Israel can not afford to lose.

        Reply
    • 0%

      blowback4 months, 3 weeks ago

      double post deleted

      Reply

• KvilleTXComment removed: User banned.11 Replies

  • 0%

    vor4 months, 3 weeks ago

    Useless bravado! As useless as the threats from this supposed OBL. How exactly is he surviving in a cave high in the mountains of Waziristan when he supposedly needs kidney treatments, even possibly dialysis?

    These are all idle threats until somebody truly crazy gets the bomb and decides that the supposed afterlife awaiting is preferable to life on this planet and then makes that decision for the rest of us. Religious belief will be the likely catalyst.

    And remember all of the al-Qaeda cells we were warned about after 9/11? Where are they now and why have they sat idle for nearly 6 years? After Madrid and Bali pretty much silence. Did they all go to Iraq to fight with the offshoot branch? A very ineffective group regardless.

    Reply

    5 Replies

    • 0%

      markmawn24 months, 3 weeks ago

      Haven't see a fuschia alert in years!

      Reply
    • 0%

      NoSpinDave4 months, 3 weeks ago

      "And remember all of the al-Qaeda cells we were warned about after 9/11? Where are they now and why have they sat idle for nearly 6 years? After Madrid and Bali pretty much silence."

      Because, if the left wing extremists want to admit it or not, the policy of the Bush administration of fighting the fight "on their turf" has worked!

      Reply

      3 Replies

      • 0%

        hyperbola4 months, 3 weeks ago

        Well, if your call bleeding us to death with a thousand cuts "success", you have never heard of Pyrrhic victories.

        The three trillion dollar war

        The cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts have grown to staggering proportions

        The Bush Administration was wrong about the benefits of the war and it was wrong about the costs of the war....

        http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/column...

        Reply
      • 0%

        Endoscopy4 months, 3 weeks ago

        They have been going to Iraq to try and stop the country from ruling itself with a form of democracy. That is what Osama said was the highest priority.

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 0%

          blowback4 months, 3 weeks ago

          Regardless of what you think Osama Bin Laden

          may or may not have said, the country will never

          rule itself so long as we are there and in charge.

          Reply
  • 0%

    antibrainwasher4 months, 3 weeks ago

    Long live the jewish demi-god Texas evangelicals worship, along with the sacred Jewish mythology. Long live the racial purity of Israel, and let us pray that Israel completes its ethnic cleansing, for they are gods chosen strand of DNA.

    God bless the Neocon's who fund the right wing think tanks, and own 100% of all American Media, and control 100% of TV news, and control the periodic message from Bin Laden, the satanic evil one. Long live Mortan Downy Junior, produced by Hollywood Jews, Funded by Hollywood Jews, and Reaping millions for Hollwood Jews, for he uses superior technology to kill the evil Muslims.

    Reply

    4 Replies

    • 0%

      antibrainwasher4 months, 3 weeks ago

      Last I checked, they weren't accepting Texas Pentacostals for citizenship in Israel. You aren't genetically qualified. You can worship your jewish demi-god from afar, and you can suscribe to fox news, same thing.

      Reply
    • 0%

      NoSpinDave4 months, 3 weeks ago

      "Long live the jewish demi-god Texas evangelicals worship, along with the sacred Jewish mythology. Long live the racial purity of Israel, and let us pray that Israel completes its ethnic cleansing, for they are gods chosen strand of DNA."

      PURE RACIST RANT from another one of Libscapes "supposedly" enlightened liberal extremists!

      LONG LIVE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THEIR BLATANT HYPOCRISY!!!!

      Reply

      2 Replies

      • 0%

        hyperbola4 months, 3 weeks ago

        Well Hagee has been forced to apologize to Catholics for his raving hatred. Palestinian christians have also been complaining about Hagee for some time. To prove your statement wrong, it would be appropriate for Hagee to also be forced to apologize to christian palestinians.

        Challenging Christian Zionism

        The movement of Christian Zionism provides a challenge and an embarrassment to Palestinian Christians at a number of crucial levels, requiring us to address this issue theologically, politically, and existentially. It raises for us a number of issues that must be addressed.

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 0%

          hyperbola4 months, 3 weeks ago

          First and foremost are the theological issues: What kind of God does Christianity teach and what kind of God do we believe in? Is God a tribal, territorially- based God, partial to the tribe of the Hebrews and interested in granting them a particular piece of land in Palestine to be their eternal birthright regardless of the rights of its indigenous inhabitants?? Is God the Lord of Hosts, glorying in the military exploits of his people, and wrathful and vengeful towards their enemies, assuring them

          of military victory (regardless of their own spiritual state of godliness or lack thereof )? Or is God the sacrificial God who loves the whole world, and who, as revealed to us in Christ, transcends racial and national boundaries, and opens his arms and offers salvation to Jew and gentile alike, inviting into his universal kingdom all those who believe in him, granting them the power

          to be children of God, and inheritors of the promises??..

          http://www.sabeel.org/documents/cs32.pdf

          Reply
• 0%

  dunkirk4 months, 3 weeks ago

  " I've heard this so many times in the last 45 years I'm bored with it."

  Hmmmm kinda like the end is in sight or we've just turned the corner?

  But if your bored with this and are saying their announcements are nothing to get worried about we're in Iraq because......

  Reply

  3 Replies

  • 0%