This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
If he ever quoted me, and I'm one of the top 10% of posters here, and also in the top 5% of pos./neg. ratio, I'd have a stroke. I've been watching these weekly updates for over 6 months now
and no longer expect to see my name, (even when I get the highest amount of positives in a post he's quoting neg. leaders)
but I'm sure there's some self justified reason.
patronizing???
For a truthful example of submissions shouldn't there be a truthful sample of responses?
If he ever quoted me, and I'm one of the top 10% of posters here, and also in the top 5% of pos./neg. ratio, I'd have a stroke. I've been watching these weekly updates for over 6 months now
and no longer expect to see my name, (even when I get the highest amount of positives in a post he's quoting neg. leaders)
but I'm sure there's some self justified reason.
patronizing???
For a truthful example of submissions shouldn't there be a truthful sample of responses?
THE week in photos was not what we commented on..It was the week in review..
The photos are fine.
This story has changed!