This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
As part of the federal contract you just get the contractors to waive any objection to jurisdiction and to submit to US government investigatory and prosecution even if the event occurs overseas.
Your idea would probably work in ANY other Administration. This Administration not only would NEVER put that in the contract ("these kind of regulation would only hamper our ability to the job that's required") but if they 'inherited' a contractor that DID agree to it, they would NEVER prosecute. History has shown that to be fact.
How hateful is that comment? Is it because you don't believe it's true, or is it because you believe that whatever this administration has done or is responsible for, is of such a high purpose that condoning rape, a crime anywhere, is just another part of collateral damage?
As part of the federal contract you just get the contractors to waive any objection to jurisdiction and to submit to US government investigatory and prosecution even if the event occurs overseas.
Your idea would probably work in ANY other Administration. This Administration not only would NEVER put that in the contract ("these kind of regulation would only hamper our ability to the job that's required") but if they 'inherited' a contractor that DID agree to it, they would NEVER prosecute. History has shown that to be fact.
Thats right under this administration all cases of rape have been halted in their tracks.
Think about the hate you spew.
endo,
How hateful is that comment? Is it because you don't believe it's true, or is it because you believe that whatever this administration has done or is responsible for, is of such a high purpose that condoning rape, a crime anywhere, is just another part of collateral damage?
You know Endoscopy I gave you a positive because I agreed with your first comment.
As to the rest of the comment I whole heartedly disagree with you.