New Evidence Challenges Official Story of RFK Shooting »
Posted by: Neophile 6 months agoThe official record states that senator Robert F Kennedy, like his brother before him, was killed by a crazed lone gunman. But the assassination of a man who seemed to embody so much hope for a bitterly divided country embroiled in an unpopular war still troubles this nation.
Read Full Story at guardian.co.uk
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 47
-

BronxBomber6 months ago
-
-

injest6 months ago
"I question the timing of this, are they sending us a message?"
I contacted the office of THEY and confirmed that yes THEY are sending you a message.
However THEY stated that if your decoder ring does not work on this one it's because THEY don't want you to know about it. Stand by for instructions from THEM.
Reply -

BronxBomber6 months ago
-

ConquerorWyrm6 months ago
-

Blackacereturn6 months ago
I get your point but the they i talk about are the they who put this out!
Reply
-
-
JohnQPublicComment removed: User banned.6 Replies
-
-

DropkickaLib6 months ago
Let's see. The Kennedy's "reached out" to Sam Giancana to get mob support for the labor union vote, which famously won West Virginia and thereby an extremely close election for Kennedy. Afterwards, Bobby targeted the mob for prosecution and they didn't appreciate the Kennedys' ungratefulness. Like many mob associates, they got themselves "whacked".
Reply-

simonsez6 months ago
Whoever got Jack probably got Bobby as well.
I agree with Dropkick that it probably was a mob hit.
Reply -

DropkickaLib6 months ago
-
-

1-2-Oscar6 months ago
Trash.
An admittedly "poor" sound recording is used as the basis for unlimited speculation? Will "spectroscopic analysis" of the flawed tape magically reveal the participation of "the Bilderbergs" and George H. W. Bush in the murder of Robert Kennedy?
If you can't connect those people to the assassination, what's the point in having the tape?
Reply -

Jaydee406 months ago
-

DropkickaLib6 months ago
-
-

BB646 months ago
Oh for God sake, another Kennedy assassination theory? Witnesses not only disarmed and captured Sirhan. This was pretty open and shut. This whole thing stinks of conspiricy book sellers looking to make more money. This is reported by the Guardian, not the most reliable.
The whole "science" they're asking us to trust is very old audio recordings. Hardly the "proof" you would like. No witnesses reported anyone else. This was a rather clean hit and take down. Perhaps the UK reporters should concentrate on the Princess' inquest and why having a drunk driver isn't a good idea.
Reply-

DropkickaLib6 months ago
The British tabloid press has already played the "Muslim love child" angle as long as possible.
Reply -

Will13136 months ago
-

Teagen6 months ago
First off, why would he need to fire 14 rounds. He was almost on top of RFK. The claims made here would mean more than 5 government agencies covered up an assassination.
As far as a secret conspiracy, why wouldn't they take him out with a sniper or bomb. Better yet, if the claim is the CIA, NSA or GOP, why not use a little poison. Cause a heart attack and there's no assassin to hide or pay. Oh, I forgot, this was the Guardian. It's George W. Bush's fault.
Reply
-
-

rightfromwrong2 months, 2 weeks ago
Kennedy was shot in the back of the head and twice under his arm. Sirhan Sirhan shot from the front. Obviously there was a conspiracy. If it was the mob they likely got their instructions from the Bilderbergs who were/are against everything which the Kennedies stood for. JFK said that America should not tolerate secret societies!!!!
Reply
-
-

Wolfie20076 months ago
I wouldn't get too excited about this as years ago the LAPD reported the evidence taken from the room where RFK was shot was lost and/or destroyed. This is usually what happens in controversial cases like this, don't ya know. lol You know like JFK's brain missing. Another point is that Sirhan Sirhan has always denied any memory of the shooting.
Reply -

aceofspades16 months ago
Any time an event happens that is of such enormity as to change the course of history, people jump on the conspiracy bandwagon not being able to conceive that the act could have been done by one person.
If there had been better communication, Cain would have been accused of being part of a conspiracy. Who could explain the missing bloody shepherd's crook? & what happened to the missing sheep?
Reply -

1-2-Oscar6 months ago
Television producers and third-rate journalists have access to an unlimited number of "experts."
Reply
Submitted By:
NeophileI'm a Propeller Scout so if you have any questions or concerns, send me a message and I'll be happy to help.
Also submitted:
- 1.0 - 38 Million View Obamas Speech; Highest-Rated Convention In History
- 1.0 - Ad Featuring Ted Stevens Endorsing Sarah Palin Removed from Her Website
- 5.0 - Happy 72nd Birthday, John McCain!
- 9.9 - Cindy McCain's Half Sister: "I'm Voting for Barack Obama"
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Also Propping This Article
TimALoftis
pamcak3
capn_caveman
MidnightPrism
Helixbuilder
ciera-marie
berkeley
TGrass3001
BuyRealEstate
ameliog
Groups Watching This
No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?




