Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 419

• 0%

  deathray1 year, 1 month ago

  This doesn't bode well.

  Reply

  14 Replies

  • 0%

    tehranchik1 year, 1 month ago

    I'm not buying the story that's being released. Something else is going on here.

    Reply

    10 Replies

    • 0%

      dandt16121 year, 1 month ago

      My question is, Who can you trust in Iraq? Can we believe what anyone is telling us from inside Iraq???????

      Reply

      4 Replies

      • 0%

        ciera-marie1 year, 1 month ago

        We interrupt the comments on this thread with the following SPAM ALERT:

        The comment posted by metrix012's comment is spam.

        Comment has been reported.

        Reply
      • 0%

        m-simon1 year, 1 month ago

        Iraq, Gaza, Lebanon, who can tell the difference?

        Reply

        2 Replies

        • 0%

          Candida1 year, 1 month ago

          You are right. It's impossible to tell whether anybody is telling the truth in the whole Middle East. Or about the Middle East for that matter.

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 0%

            foksipayne1 year, 1 month ago

            now he's using 013! SPAM!!!

            Reply
    • 0%

      SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

      Yeah tehranchik, it couldn't have been any of the insurgents supported by Iran, right?

      I'm thinking the Israels did it, are you with me?

      Reply

      3 Replies

      • 0%

        tehranchik1 year, 1 month ago

        SpazMat--you wouldn't like what I have to say.

        Reply

        2 Replies

        • 0%

          SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

          But to tell you the truth, I would fight to protect your right to say it.

          But you are right, it was a cheap shot that I took.

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 0%

            tehranchik1 year, 1 month ago

            I appreciate that--thank you.

            Reply
    • 0%

      goodgrief1 year, 1 month ago

      You're kidding, right? The "something else" is the same something that's been going on for 1400 years. Why would any non-muslim take this religion seriously when it routinely uses holy places as military targets and/or strongholds?

      Reply
  • 0%

    koranagirl1 year, 1 month ago

    It is incredibly sad that such violence is going on there and all the US teaches is how to spread munitions and not peace and love. If we spent 2 billion on teaching peace and love, this would never be an issue. For a great book on peace and love that can be found at amazon dot com, LuLu dot com or ebay, search at these sites for "Korana of Mother Goddess." We need to pray for them all.

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      cushi1 year, 1 month ago

      Koranagirl, shame on you! This is not a vehicle for cheap advertising! Take a hint from the fact that Metrix0 whatever has been reported. Peace and love.

      Reply
  • 0%

    monicadozy3 months, 1 week ago

    This is absolutely bad sign

    Reply
• 0%

  TimALoftis1 year, 1 month ago

  headlines from article;

  Iraqi PM has imposed a curfew for Baghdad until further notice

  Radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr calls for three days of mourning

  Iraq's top Shiite cleric condemns the attack.

  Reply

  3 Replies

  • 0%

    DanmLiberals1 year, 1 month ago

    Everyone, they condemned the attack so it's ok... you can all go home now.

    Reply

    2 Replies

    • 0%

      dandt16121 year, 1 month ago

      This is SPAM. Please Report!!!

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 0%

        ciera-marie1 year, 1 month ago

        So is the first one up above.

        Reply
• 0%

  aceofspades11 year, 1 month ago

  HOLY SHIITE!!

  Reply

  1 Reply

  • 0%

    Natureboy1 year, 1 month ago

    That being the case, worship that Shi'ite!

    Reply
• 0%

  Will13131 year, 1 month ago

  I say bomb the SHIITE out of all of them.. let Allah sort them out...

  Reply

  2 Replies

  • 0%

    ryan6011 year, 1 month ago

    "I say bomb the SHIITE out of all of them.. let Allah sort them out..."

    Isn't that the same strategy that Osama bin Laden is trying to use on the West?

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      rimbaud1 year, 1 month ago

      On the West?? It's the strategy he is using on Muslims in the Middle East.

      Reply
• 0%

  skyking2p1 year, 1 month ago

  I heard the weather in Baghdad is going up to 120F this week. I really feel sorry for all the American Troops that are in that living hell there. I would think this will only make it hotter for everyone. Support our troops: Get them the hell out of that place now!! Impeach Bush!!!

  Reply

  63 Replies

  • 0%

    DanmLiberals1 year, 1 month ago

    Thanks for the weather report. BTW, someone just got bombed. I think u missed that part of this story

    Reply

    60 Replies

    • 0%

      skyking2p1 year, 1 month ago

      no Danm I think the story is about a MOSQUE that got bombed and the hell that it will put OUR troops in. Impeach Bush!!!

      Reply

      59 Replies

      • 0%

        RedSoxGirl1 year, 1 month ago

        Go ahead. Impeach Bush. That way we can draw in every single Democrat, under sworn testimony, who voted for this war that had the exact same intelligence about Iraq with the same conclusions about Saddam as Bush. Let's find out who is lying here.

        Might as well call in Former President Clinton, Al Gore, all of the people who suggested it was the right thing to do from the very beginning and then changed their minds because of poll results.

        PLEEEEASE impeach. You'll take the whole damn bunch down, along with your so called Democrat "leaders".

        Leaders that have sold out the loony far left time and time again after they get your votes.

        Reply

        53 Replies

        • 0%

          skyking2p1 year, 1 month ago

          not sure you can impeach Bill and Al since they aren't in any government office.

          Reply

          34 Replies

          • 0%

            RedSoxGirl1 year, 1 month ago

            No, but they would definitely lose their reputations. And under impeachment processes anyone can be called to testify.

            Why do you think they haven't motioned for impeachment?

            The reason is because they are as just as liable as Bush.

            And there are literally no lawful grounds for impeachment, just alot of accusations and finger pointing.

            Reply

            33 Replies

            • 0%

              joeblowe1 year, 1 month ago

              There is currently at least one: The authority for our troops being in Iraq EXPIRED when Saddam's government was toppled. GWB is currently conducting combat operations without the formal consent of Congress. It could also be argued that since we are not, technically, at war with anyone that suspending Habeas Corpus is unconstitutional. Certain "Presidential Orders" could also be considered contrary to his oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

              Reply

              15 Replies

              • 0%

                RedSoxGirl1 year, 1 month ago

                "There is currently at least one: The authority for our troops being in Iraq EXPIRED when Saddam's government was toppled"

                Then you might as well throw out all of Congress who supported reconstruction and occupation efforts AFTER Saddam was toppled and have been providing the money for it since then. Democrat and Republican alike.

                As far as habeas corpus, I assume you mean US born detainees at Gitmo. When the President declared suspending habeaus corpus for these detainees there was NO standard law declaring it illegal. Now there could possibly be and I would assume Bush will follow the law on what the Supreme Court decides.

                So, no law against it before = no grounds for impeachment.

                If he does it after it becomes a law, then you may have basis for your argument, but as of now you don't.

                Reply

                13 Replies

                • 0%

                  skyking2p1 year, 1 month ago

                  torture secret prisons wire tapping with out a warrant Remember the secret hospital visit when Ashcroft knew it was not with in the law. And I think being as stupid as bush is SHOULD be an impeachable offense.

                  Reply

                  8 Replies

                  • 0%

                    RedSoxGirl1 year, 1 month ago

                    "torture secret prisons wire tapping with out a warrant Remember the secret hospital visit when Ashcroft knew it was not with in the law. And I think being as stupid as bush is SHOULD be an impeachable offense."

                    Hey, when you can find a link between the president and that hospital visit, then you go ahead and impeach all you want. Until then you are just doing what everyone else is doing, guessing. The Senate Judiciary Committee hasn't found anything as to date.

                    "Secret Prisons"

                    Might as well throw out the Senate and House Committee's on Intelligence and the Armed Services Committee's. Which by the way, include both top Democrats and Republicans. If you bring Bush down, you bring them all down.

                    And I'm sorry, stupidity isn't a impeachable offense.

                    Reply

                    6 Replies

                    • 0%

                      Candida1 year, 1 month ago

                      RedSoxGirl: '"Secret Prisons" Might as well throw out the Senate and House Committee's on Intelligence and the Armed Services Committee's. Which by the way, include both top Democrats and Republicans. If you bring Bush down, you bring them all down.'

                      Sounds good to me. Throw out everyone who was complicit in that abomination.

                      Reply

                      5 Replies

                      • 0%

                        SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

                        There is nothing wrong with secret prisons, in their own right.

                        Torture is not what I am talking about, it is immoral, and from a tactical standpoint, just stupid.

                        Reply

                        3 Replies

                        • 0%

                          Candida1 year, 1 month ago

                          Then why do you need secret prisons? Why won't the ordinary ones do?

                          Reply

                          2 Replies

                          • 84%

                            SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

                            At the risk of stating the obvious, so that people the you don't want to know where they are, don't.

                            Reply

                            1 Reply

                            • 84%

                              Candida1 year, 1 month ago

                              So people can disappear without a trace and nobody can check whether their rights are violated?

                              Reply
                      • 0%

                        SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

                        This is an answer to "So people can disappear without a trace and nobody can check whether their rights are violated?"

                        There is oversight of the prisons by the house and senate intelligence committees. Those committees have oversight authority (and responsibility).

                        I suppose you have problems with those, from your comments. You can get as paranoid as you want, to the point where you believe that unless _you_personally_ know the complete history and outcome of every little thing that is ever done, it can't be trusted.

                        But how do you trust the people who are telling you the history and outcome? So now you have to be everywhere, all the time to check everything.

                        But I don't trust you, so I need to be watching you.

                        Pretty soon, you are "Back, in the USSR".

                        Reply
                  • 0%

                    SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

                    sky king, I want you to think a minute and let me know if you can remember when Ashcroft thinking it was against the law (or not) was something that liberals lent any credence to.

                    I'm not banging on you in particular.

                    And while liberals in particular are the point of that comment, it cuts against the conservatives to. "Well Clinton bombed Serbia".

                    It is right or it is wrong on it's own merits.

                    "And I think being as stupid as bush is SHOULD be an impeachable offense."

                    THAT was funny, and I don't believe the "stupid" comments about him.

                    Reply
                • 0%

                  DisgruntledPatriot1 year, 1 month ago

                  Take it to them Boston! I'm a Yankees fan, but way to handle these fallaciuos arguments. Here you go.

                  "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

                  - Ronald Reagan

                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  • 0%

                    RedSoxGirl1 year, 1 month ago

                    "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

                    - Ronald Reagan

                    I'm a middle of the road person. Neither Democrat or Republican. I just try to use common sense and Reagan used a good form of that in his statement.

                    Reply
                • 0%

                  joeblowe1 year, 1 month ago

                  I'm not sure it would be a BAD idea to throw out all of Congress. Most of it, for sure.

                  I'm pretty sure the 5th amendment covers the part about being held without due process. Also the 6th. And the 14th. So, yeah, there IS a law. The supreme law of the land. Just because GWB may not want to acknowledge that, doesn't mean the rest of us don't. And, here's a quote right from our Constitution (Article 1, Section 8): The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

                  There is currently NO rebellion nor Invasion. This is VERY clear.

                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  • 0%

                    SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

                    Come on, Joe, use some imagination.

                    We invaded Iraq, that's an invasion, so isn't that a good enough reason?

                    ---

                    Detaining Americans, anywhere in the world, or anyone on US soil (again, short of an invasion) without habeas corpus is unconstitutional.

                    Reply
              • 0%

                Charlson1 year, 1 month ago

                Damn good argument!

                Reply
            • 0%

              vor1 year, 1 month ago

              Clinton looked at essentially the same information the neo-cons had and chose NOT to invade. Go the the PNAC website and read the letter from Cheney to Clinton begging us to take action (in '98!).

              http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonle...

              (Cheney has electronically removed his name from this document since it was posted. That says enough!)

              Clinton should be faulted for putting Chalabi and the INC on the payroll the rest of this sh-t is the neo-cons responsibility alone. Believing in Curveball. Stating that a piece of aluminum found buried in a backyard constitutes a nuclear program. A f-cking joke. But their intentions were not to be denied.

              It all comes down to the fact that the people who are truly responsible for our invading Iraq (the PNAC neo-cons and their supporters) take NO RESPONSIBILITY for their actions. They likely never will. Will blind followers like yourself they will never have to.

              Reply

              13 Replies

              • 0%

                toronto1141 year, 1 month ago

                Oh here it comes RedSoxGirl! You backed them into a corner, now the personal attacks come on strong. Such a weak tactic of a liberal. It shows no basis for argument and proves how wrong they actually are!

                Hey V.O.R. weren't you the one defending jihad and praising the death of Americans on the Gaza postings? You and gaumahuache?

                Yep, I believe you are. The enemy is among us here on Nutscape for sure!!!!!!!

                Reply

                11 Replies

                • 0%

                  gamahuche1 year, 1 month ago

                  Perhaps you mean "the" actually "is".

                  But then probably not.

                  Don't get too over-excited or you'll blow out your pacemaker.

                  Reply
                • 0%

                  vor1 year, 1 month ago

                  How dare you accuse me of praising the deaths of my fellow Americans? Are you clinically insane? Good thing this is a message board because if you said that to my face I wouldbe in jail for assault. And I would have made sure every penny of the bail was worth it.

                  YOU STEPPED WAY OVER THE LINE!!!

                  I give you facts and evidence and you call that a PERSONAL ATTACK? That you are blind followers? The facts support that entirely.

                  You are a miserable piece of human garbage. Call me the enemy. You must have been skimmed off the top of the pond because you certainly didn't enter this world through a birth canal.

                  Reply

                  2 Replies

                  • 0%

                    SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

                    It was a personal attack. His was too. You don't know if she is a blind follower or not. I agree with some things Bush supports, but it is a coincidence of interests. I agreed with some things that Clinton did (shudder), for the same reason.

                    Do not assume that everyone that agrees with Bush is stupid, or that they are agreeing with him because HE said it.

                    Reply
                  • 0%

                    blinkers1 year, 1 month ago

                    Justifiable outrage commendably expressed!

                    (I think Toronto114's rather a confused poster, here)

                    Reply
                • 0%

                  gamahuche1 year, 1 month ago

                  gamahuche has NEVER and will NEVER praise the death of ANYBODY. nor any animal, nor insect and not even birds that are turkeys like U. [though gamahuche has been known to eat dead turkeys..]

                  Anyone who uses this this ridiculous expression NUTSCAPE should be ashamed of hanging out with people that they consider are nuts.

                  As for people being the enemy - grow up!

                  Adult people should be able to disagree VEHEMENTLY and still go out for a beer together.

                  I don't know whether the 114 means that you're a really old fart but some of my best friends have been really old farts too.

                  Reply

                  5 Replies

                  • 0%

                    Stitches68W1 year, 1 month ago

                    "As you brainwash your own people to have a peaceful and better life, that you should kill people in the Middle East, and then get killed. Your solders are killed everyday, and their parents are cursing Bush & co, what is the difference? Muslims get their reward as 72 virgins if they die resisting your policies of oppression, and your soldiers' family get medals and perhaps hand outs."

                    gamahuche, could you please explain to us all why you voted for this comment from daylight on the this page of the gaza thread? 3rd comment on the page, you voted for it.

                    http://news.netscape.com/story/2007/06/12/hamas...

                    Your reply here doesn't sound right to me.

                    Reply

                    4 Replies

                    • 0%

                      gamahuche1 year, 1 month ago

                      I don't get your point at all.

                      As for my comment here I stand by it 100%.

                      I am also 100% against the death penalty in ALL circumstances.

                      Reply
                    • 0%

                      Candida1 year, 1 month ago

                      Stitches68W: "gamahuche, could you please explain to us all why you voted for this comment from daylight"

                      I wouldn't take votes too seriously; they are handed out quite carelessly sometimes, but I can imagine why someone would vote for this one without rejoicing in the death of anyone.

                      Daylight doesn't always express himself very clearly, and he is clearly angry about the actions of the US in Iraq, as are many others.

                      He is referring to the mantra that many conservatives use that the path to peace leads through war; if we want to be safe, we have to kill all our enemies. They also often refer to the 72 virgins that the Koran, according to them, promises to the martyrs. I think Daylight's point is that people are dying in this unnecessary war on both sides, and it is bad whether you get the virgins or the medals afterward.

                      I'm not sure that this is what Daylight meant, but this is one possible interpretation.

                      Reply

                      1 Reply

                      • 0%

                        gamahuche1 year, 1 month ago

                        Thanks for doing the forensics on this Candida. I had a look back at it too and I certainly wasn't voting FOR anything that involved killing anyone or advocating violence, at least as I understood the original post.

                        But yes, sometimes daylights thoughts emerge with great energy and less direction but I did think I'd understood him and not gotten too distracted by the 72 virgins stuff.

                        Reply
                    • 0%

                      SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

                      Stitches, while I don't agree with the brainwash part, our troops are getting killed everyday. Cindy Sheahan certainly cussed Bush, and maybe some Muslims who blow themselves and others up think they are getting 72 virgins and that our policies are oppressive.

                      He was not praising the deaths of our troops, at most he was saying this was an insightful comment. I often give pluses to people who ping on me, if I think they did a good job of explaining their point, even if I disagree with their point.

                      Reply
                • 0%

                  Ratskii1 year, 1 month ago

                  You accuse VOR of name calling and then say that? You sure don't go in for consistancy.

                  Reply
              • 0%

                blinkers1 year, 1 month ago

                The importance, and relevance, of the PNAC document and its relationship to the foreign policy shambles the current administration has led the country into cannot be overstated.

                Attention drawn to it (and the need to thoroughly expunge this type of thinking from American political discourse)is always worthwhile. Good post, V.O.R.

                Reply
            • 0%

              quiescence1 year, 1 month ago

              "they are as just as liable as Bush"

              This tired old argument is repeated ad nauseam by those who are unwilling to expend the requisite intellectual energy to engage in rational discourse.

              Clinton and Gore did not mastermind the war; they were not the architects of the war, and they were not engaged in intelligence manipulation in an attempt to sell the war to the American public. At worst, they, like the democrats in Congress, were accomplices to the crime.

              Certainly no reasonable person would draw a moral equivalence between masterminding a criminal act and being an accomplice to it.

              Reply

              2 Replies

              • 0%

                gamahuche1 year, 1 month ago

                Excellently said quiescence!

                Reply
              • 0%

                SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

                I could have read it wrong, it was the last page, so I don't see it now, but I thought she was saying that in an impeachment, all the congressmen would be questioned as to "what they knew and when they knew it", and they would not be able to say that they were or were not given the information they needed to make a correct vote.

                As far as Clinton and Gore "not engaged in intelligence manipulation in an attempt to sell the war to the American public", sure, but do you know what intelligence they did manipulate? Are you sure they did not get us into the Balkans by manipulating intell, of do you just not know what they manipulated?

                Reply
        • 0%

          Petom11 year, 1 month ago

          They all voted for the war...before they voted against it.

          Reply

          8 Replies

          • 0%

            PsychoHosebeast1 year, 1 month ago

            ...before they knew the truth.

            Reply

            2 Replies

            • 0%

              schillinfl11 year, 1 month ago

              LMFAO

              Free pass for Democrats, not for Republicans.

              HAHAHAHAHA

              Thanks for showing your hypocrisy.

              Reply

              1 Reply

              • 0%

                SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

                Roger that, what is good for the goose is good for the gander.

                Reply
          • 0%

            vor1 year, 1 month ago

            That is such specious logic. There was 85% public support for the war. The will of the people mandated we go. Of course that will was created with biased and non-credible evidence. Go back and review the statements of administration officials. Much of it was frought with lies. Sure it was the same evidence that Clinton held, the same evidence he had enough misgivings about not to act, the same evidence that the neo-cons twisted and turned to meet their needs.

            Reply

            4 Replies

            • 0%

              SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

              The will of the people only trumps political leanings sometimes.

              Much of everything is fraught with lies, unfortunately. But the assessment of a number of governments pointed to the WMD threat, Iraq's government being one of them.

              Finding out later that something is wrong is not the same as having lied about it when the intell pointed in that direction.

              Reply

              3 Replies

              • 0%

                vor1 year, 1 month ago

                You really need to do your research. The Foreign agencies you refer to were sure of the intelligence because WE presented it to them. This is never explained when this talking point is used. But that was back in the day when much of the rest of the world actually believed what we were saying. The UN inspectors were coming up dry yet we ordered them out and began the invasion. Why? What was the mad rush? The Germans flatout warned us that Curveball was a pathological liar and an alcoholic. So why do his references to biolabs show up in Powell's UN speech? After Powell had questioned the sources himself? The CIA gets blamed but much of the so-called damning evidence came out of the DOD office. Look up Douglas Feith sometime.

                Reply

                2 Replies

                • 0%

                  SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

                  I looked up Feith. He believed that Iraq was doing a good job of hiding WMDs, so he grabbed every corroborating piece of info he could, weak or strong.

                  When you see something with Bush, do you give him the benefit of the doubt, or do you know he messed up, but you just haven't figured out how?

                  Conservatives, same for Clinton and Kerry. Everyone has their own idea of how the world works, and they often force the data, or throw out the "outliers", if the data does not go along with their "truth".

                  Intelligence data is noisy. It's not like the movies where you get a satellite image of two guys exchanging a box of plutonium. It is scattered dots, and you don't know which ones are real, or what they are related to.

                  So in their defense: The administration had just gotten beaten up for not "connecting the dots" on 9/11. There were more dots, in a straighter line, connecting WMDs and Iraq, than there were for planes flying into buildings.

                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  • 0%

                    vor1 year, 1 month ago

                    I give Bush all of the benefit of the doubt because he has so little to do with the creation of the policy he represents.

                    Pretty weak research on Feith...please look further than the National Review. He was the one working with Chalabi and the INC, who filled his head with visions of ICBM's and sarin gas. There was NO supporting evidence. And do you think Chalabi might have an ulterior motive? He thought he would be the new Prime Minister, nevermind the Shia didn't want him (see results of Iraqi Election in '05).

                    But I think deep in your post you are admitting they screwed up. But why can't they do the same? They have offered repentance for various mistakes yet no one has yet taken any of the reponsibility or identified any specific mistakes.

                    Reply
        • 0%

          PsychoHosebeast1 year, 1 month ago

          So, it appears that you feel that once someone is presented with the truth, you think they shouldn't be allowed to change their mind. Is that what you're saying? Because if it is, it's an extremely stupid, selfish and naive position.

          How's it feel to be in the bottom 20th percentile anyway? Enjoying the view of the rest of America's ass from down there are you?

          Reply

          8 Replies

          • 0%

            RedSoxGirl1 year, 1 month ago

            I'd love to sit here and debate you all day and prove how facetious your spinned arguments are, but I actully have a job. A demanding assistant prosecutor one at that.

            It amazes me how some of you post all day and all night on here. It's no wonder how some of you can come up with such ludicrous arguments and conspiracies about the government when you have nothing to do all day.

            Have fun!

            Reply

            6 Replies

            • 0%

              vor1 year, 1 month ago

              Run for the hills Red Sox Girl..you and your neo-con friends...run, far, far way...

              Reply
            • 0%

              saintetienne1 year, 1 month ago

              RedSoxGirl,

              Most Liberal loudmouths don't have jobs. They're waiting for the DumDumDemocrats to come back in to power so that they can collect more welfare and push for a Socialist state, making it easier for them to sit around and "intellecutalize" (i.e. whine, complain) all day.

              Well, I can't waste time on Nutscape. Gotta get back to MY job.

              Reply

              4 Replies

              • 0%

                gamahuche1 year, 1 month ago

                "Gotta get back to MY job"

                Elevator operator?

                Shoeshine man?

                Vaudeville clown?

                Rodent Operative?

                Hell it must be something REALLY important like that to deserve those capital letters.

                Reply

                3 Replies

                • 0%

                  saintetienne1 year, 1 month ago

                  God, gama-hore, what an elitist pig you are.

                  Are elevator operators and shoeshine men beneath you? Sorry they aren't up to your standards, but at least the people who have these jobs are WORKING, unlike you, who collects welfare and endorses Socialism.

                  Reply

                  2 Replies

                  • 0%

                    Candida1 year, 1 month ago

                    saintetienne,

                    How do you know that gamahuche is not independently wealthy?

                    Reply
                  • 0%

                    gamahuche1 year, 1 month ago

                    Elitist pig!

                    Surely you can do better than that!

                    I am delighted by many of the characters that I mentioned, especially the rodent operative that entertained us in NYC and charged a huge fee for his many hours of discourse on the ways of rats.. Not much results but great theatre.

                    Your other comments are your mad projections but if they amuse you who cares.

                    Socialism is a dirty word in my vocabulary however but then I'm sure that what I define as socialism is something completely different than you do,

                    There's no way that you will get the better of me with any of your tricks and juvenile name-calling though once in a while I might swat at you like a pesky bug.

                    Consider yourself lucky that I've paid any attention at all to your twaddle.

                    Reply
          • 0%

            SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

            I was going to give you a plus until your last line.

            Do you think "lowering yourself to the level of your enemy" is ok here, but not on the battlefield?

            I'm hoping that you don't believe in allowing torture, just because the bad guys do it.

            Now that you know the truth, I won't give you a hard time if you change your mind.

            Reply
      • 0%

        HannibalBarca1 year, 1 month ago

        RedSoxGirl: I have read your comments and have to say,BS.To state that a lawyer has common sense, yourself, and not apply it,well that is spin, and lawyers are the grand masters of spin. You have said more on this page than Gonzo did in all his hearings, you have remembered more and since you and he are of the same profession my common sense tells me he is hiding something.You said "And there are literally no lawful grounds for impeachment, just alot of accusations and finger pointing."but lawyers can spin any law they want to suit them, truth or justice are only bylines; where else can a man be guilty of murder in 1 court and innocent in another? What common sense lets a woman get 80 mill for a hot cup of coffee or a criminal who broke in a garage able to sue the owners because the door opener didn't work.Lawyers can make this happen despite what common sense tells us....

        Reply

        3 Replies

        • 0%

          HannibalBarca1 year, 1 month ago

          I don't need a scientist to tell me the sky is blue or a lawyer to tell me that no law has been broken, I can see it but in a court of law there is no justice so shrub and co. and all the politicians will go free and if they go to court only lawyers will get richer but nothing will change and that is what my common sense tells me. Less than 5% of the worlds pop. lives in the USA; so do 50% of the worlds lawyers and most if not all elected officials are lawyers and that is the main reason we can never get a straight answer

          Reply

          2 Replies

          • 0%

            saintetienne1 year, 1 month ago

            Hanni-dull,

            Didn't you get RedSoxGirl's last post? She's busy WORKING. Let me explain that to you:

            That's when a mature adult accepts responsibility for themselves, and through education and ambition - backed by a democracy and a free-market system - is able to support themselves through financial compensation which they themselves earn, and in turn contribute to society through paying taxes on said income.

            You should try it sometime. I'm sure you'd be less bitter and alone, and it might improve your self-esteem and give you a more positive outlook on our country.

            Reply
          • 0%

            HannibalBarca1 year, 1 month ago

            stloser:obviously you don't work as you are not mature more like manure, totaly uneducated and still a loser.I probabably pay more taxes than you make and that would be true if I still had my first job 47 years ago.

            Reply
      • 0%

        badnootka1 year, 1 month ago

        Stop stop stop the bs about impeachment. If the democrats had court credible eveidence for impeachment we would have had impeachment. THe court acceptable evidence of illegal goings on is not available to the dems. I'm not saying it doesn't exist but until someone has the balls to play hardball your rhetoric is stale and a waste of time. You've been calling for impeachment for 2 years, maybe longer. How long will you sing the same tune that has no melody?

        Reply
  • 0%

    Natureboy1 year, 1 month ago

    120 degrees is hot, I have seen it in Phoenix, pero with AC.

    Wouldn't be even worse if some mouth-breathing imperialist white-skinned bunch of dull normal mental-defectives had bombed out your infrastructure in the name of a democracy they enforced on you at gunpoint and as a result you had no freakin' air conditioning?

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%

      SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

      Yes, and even worse if your own countrymen, along with your Muslim brothers from other countries, blew it back up every time those imperialist bastiches rebuilt it.

      Reply
• 0%

  TimALoftis1 year, 1 month ago

  CNN is reporting that the bombing appears to be a 'Inside Job'

  Reply

  1 Reply

  • 0%

    SpazMat1 year, 1 month ago

    Yes, as I understand it, the bomb went off inside.

    Reply
• 0%

  amerettoice1 year, 1 month ago

  CNN... corrupt news network...

  pretty soon all the mosques will be destroyed ...and then what will they blow up?

  such a PEACEfull religion that spons such violence

  Reply

  4 Replies

  • 0%

    skyking2p1 year, 1 month ago

    I think the Bush boys are a little to blame for what is happening in Iraq. After all we did INVADE there country.

    Reply

    3 Replies

    • 0%

      saintetienne1 year, 1 month ago

      skyqueen,

      Your comments are broad, knee-jerk and completely infantile.

      It's a weekday. Shouldn't you be in school today? Where is your mother? Does she know you're home playing with the computer?

      Reply

      1 Reply

      • 0%

        PsychoHosebeast1 year, 1 month ago

        And no offense, but speaking of completely infantile, you sound like you just rolled in from an AOL teen chatroom. If you don't really have something on topic to say, please resist the urge to pass gas in front of the rest of us.

        Reply
    • 0%